<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>OWL: Orthopedic Topics/Trauma/Femur</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com</link>
<description>Fractures of the femur</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Mon May 30 2011 23:19:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 OWL Inc.</copyright>
<managingEditor>orthopaedicweblinks@gmail.com (Christian Veillette)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>orthopaedicweblinks@gmail.com (OWL Inc.)</webMaster>
<item>
<title>Avoiding Missed Femoral Neck Fractures</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8793.html</link>
<description>OTA paper 2004: Improvement by Using a Standard Protocol in Cases of Femoral Shaft Fractures:&lt;br&gt;
The purpose of this study was to describe a program of quality improvement and a subsequent protocol that have resulted in a reduction of missed femoral neck fractures in patients with femoral shaft fractures </description>
<pubDate>2005-09-05 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8793</guid>
<author>Tournetta et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/2528.html</link>
<description>AONA posting of the AO Classification of Long Bone Fractures</description>
<pubDate>2002-01-31 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=2528</guid>
<author>Not Available</author>
</item><item>
<title>1999 Results Of Treatment Of 111 Patients With Nonunion Of Femoral Shaft Fractures</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/9255.html</link>
<description>P. K. Beredjiklian, M.D., R. J. Naranja, M.D., R. B. Heppenstall, M.D., C. T. Brighton, M.D., Ph.D., and J. L. Esterhai, M.D. &lt;br&gt;
Abstract:  The purpose of this study is to report our experience with the treatment of femoral shaft fracture nonunion and to define poor prognostic indicators in the treatment of this complication. The records and available radiographs of 111 patients treated for nonunion of the femoral shaft in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The mean duration of follow-up after establishment of nonunion was 62 months. The following factors were found to have an adverse effect on nonunion healing (p &lt; 0.05): (1) advanced patient age; (2) presence of osteomyelitis; (3) presence of synovial pseudarthrosis; (4) duration of nonunion; (5) treatment with flexible intramedullary devices; (6) treatment with compression plating; (7) poor bone stock; (8) malalignment in the anteroposterior plane of more than 10 degrees; and (9) malalignment in the lateral plane of more than 20 degrees. (Full Text article)</description>
<pubDate>2006-04-10 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=9255</guid>
<author>Bereddjiklian et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>A Critical Analysis of the Eccentric Starting Point for Trochanteric Intramedullary Femoral Nailing</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8807.html</link>
<description>OTA Poster 2004&lt;br&gt;
The purpose of this study was to look at specific trochanteric entry sites to examine whether there is a &quot;perfect&quot; universal starting point. In addition, we examined the insertion angle, the trochanteric angle, the proximal bend, and the radius of curvature of four commonly used implants. Three different starting points were employed.</description>
<pubDate>2005-09-05 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8807</guid>
<author>Ostrum et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>A New Biological Method Of Internal Fixation Of The Femur</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/9291.html</link>
<description>Mitkovic 2001 Facta Universitatis Vol. 8, No 1, 2001 pp. 50 - 53
Abstract -&gt; Full Text &lt;br&gt;
New internal fixator that provides fixation while application can be performed by minimally invasive method with no contact between the implant and bone fragment in fracture area. The device is selfdynamisible. </description>
<pubDate>2006-04-13 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=9291</guid>
<author>Milorad Mitkovic</author>
</item><item>
<title>A Prospective Comparison of Antegrade and Retrograde Femoral Intramedullary Nailing</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8764.html</link>
<description>OTA Paper 1998 Robert F. Ostrum, MD; Animesh Agarwal, MD; Ronald Lakatos, MD; Attila Poka, MD&lt;br&gt;
The purpose of this study was to prospectively and critically examine a consecutive series of femur fractures treated with either antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing.</description>
<pubDate>2005-09-04 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8764</guid>
<author>Ostrum et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>A Prospective Evaluation of Hip Abductor Function after Femur Fracture and Antegrade Nailing</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8799.html</link>
<description>OTA Paper 2004 Archdeacon et al&lt;br&gt;
The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze hip abductor function at two discrete time points after a femur fracture treated with intramedullary nailing. </description>
<pubDate>2005-09-05 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8799</guid>
<author>Archdeacon et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>A Prospective RCT Comparing Reamed versus Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8761.html</link>
<description>OTA paper 1998 Randomized Clinical Trial: The objective of this clinical trial was to determine if the type of intramedullary nail fixation (IMN) in acute femoral shaft fractures affects pulmonary function.
</description>
<pubDate>2005-09-04 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8761</guid>
<author>DeGroote et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>Accelerated Bone Healing in Patients with Femoral Fracture and Head Injury</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8805.html</link>
<description>OTA paper 2004: We investigated whether the presence of head injury is associated with accelerated bone healing in patients with femoral shaft fractures.</description>
<pubDate>2005-09-05 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8805</guid>
<author>Mushtaq et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>Anterograde vs Retrograde Femoral Nailing</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8797.html</link>
<description>OTA paper 2004: A Prospective Randomized Evaluation: Purpose: We compared anterograde with retrograde nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures.
&lt;br&gt;Conclusions: Anterograde and retrograde nailing are both acceptable treatments for femoral shaft fractures.</description>
<pubDate>2005-09-05 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8797</guid>
<author>Tournetta et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>Comminuted Lower-Extremity Fractures Secondary to Trauma</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8745.html</link>
<description>Reports from Medscape Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine 1999
&lt;br&gt;Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures
&lt;br&gt;Fracture Healing in Tibia Fractures With an Associated Vascular Injury
&lt;br&gt;The Treatment of Lisfranc Injuries
&lt;br&gt;Open Fractures of the Patella: Long-term Functional Outcome</description>
<pubDate>2005-09-04 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8745</guid>
<author>Not Available</author>
</item><item>
<title>Controversies with Fracture Management</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8725.html</link>
<description>Medscape Conference Coverage from American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting
Day 4 - Saturday, March 18. Overview of the controveries of intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures and severe open tibial fractures.</description>
<pubDate>2005-09-04 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8725</guid>
<author>C.W. Oliver</author>
</item><item>
<title>Conversion of External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fractures in Polytrauma</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8765.html</link>
<description>OTA Paper 1998: &lt;br&gt;Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of this two-stage treatment, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 63 polytrauma patients with 69 femoral fractures treated with conversion of external fixation to IM nailing from 1989 to 1997 at our institution.</description>
<pubDate>2005-09-04 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8765</guid>
<author>Nowotarski et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>Damage Control in Femoral Shaft Fractures</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/8795.html</link>
<description>OTA Paper 2004: Risk of Local Infection?&lt;br&gt;
We aimed to determine the rate of wound infection after use of DCO procedures and primary IMN for femoral fracture stabilization in severely injured patients.&lt;br&gt;
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that infection rates after DCO for femoral fractures are not significantly different than those observed after primary IMN.</description>
<pubDate>2005-09-05 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=8795</guid>
<author>Pape et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>Distal Femoral Physeal Fractures Wheeless</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/6698.html</link>
<description>- account for approx 5% of all physeal fractures;
&lt;br&gt;- displacement in sagittal plane is assoc with Neuro/Vascular injury in popliteal fossa and instability on closed reduction;
&lt;br&gt;- common mechanism is hyperextension causing anterior displacement of epiphysis;
&lt;br&gt;- displacement in coronal plane is not assoc with other injuries, &amp; joint may be stable after closed reduction. &lt;br&gt;Wheeless&#039; Textbook of Orthopaedics</description>
<pubDate>2002-02-04 23:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=6698</guid>
<author>C.R.Wheeless</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
