<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>OWL: Orthopedic Topics/Trauma/Hip/Hip Trauma Abstracts</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com</link>
<description>Abstracts on hip fractures and dislocations from proceedings of orthopaedic meetings &amp; societies</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat Sep 12 2009 23:34:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 OWL Inc.</copyright>
<managingEditor>orthopaedicweblinks@gmail.com (Christian Veillette)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>orthopaedicweblinks@gmail.com (OWL Inc.)</webMaster>
<item>
<title>Early Mortality after Hip Fracture Is Delay to Surgery Important</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/9076.html</link>
<description> OTA 2002 - Session 6 Session VI - Geriatrics Sat., 10/12/02 Geriatrics, Paper #39, 11:37 AM Early Mortality after Hip Fracture: Is Delay to Surgery Important? Christopher G. Moran, MD ; Andrew M. Taylor, MD; University
Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom </description>
<pubDate>2005-11-03 23:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=9076</guid>
<author></author>
</item><item>
<title>How to Prevent Fixation Failure in Patients with an Osteoporotic Trochanteric</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/9074.html</link>
<description> OTA 2002 - Session 6 Session VI - Geriatrics Sat., 10/12/02 Geriatrics, Paper #37, 11:15 AM How to Prevent Fixation Failure in Patients with an Osteoporotic Trochanteric
Fracture Treated with Dynamic Hip Screw: A Prospective Randomized Study Antonio Moroni, MD ; Cesare Faldini, MD; Francesco Pegreffi,
MD; Sandro Giannini, MD; Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, University of Bologna,
Bologna, Italy Purpose: Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation is widely used for patients
with trochanteric fractures. Significant failure rates have been reported
among osteoporotic patients because of lag screw cutout resulting &amp;gt;from
inadequate fixation. Recently, studies have shown that fixation can be improved
with use of hydroxyapatite- (HA) coated AO/ASIF screws. Our purpose was
to determine whether similar results could be achieved for patients with
osteoporotic trochanteric fractures. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients with trochanteric fractures
were selected. Patients were divided into two groups and randomized to receive
135&amp;deg; 4-hole DHS with either standard lag and cortical AO/ASIF screws
(group A) or HA-coated lag and cortical AO/ASIF screws (group B). Included
were women age 65 or older, with AO type A1 or A2, and bone mineral density
(BMD) lower than -2.5 T score. Patients were excluded if the lag screw extended
into the proximal third of the femoral head. Results: Patient age, BMD, and lag screw position in the femoral
head did not differ between groups. In group A there were four patients
with cutout and none in group B ( P &amp;lt;0.05;_ _ = 0.8). Three patients
with cutout underwent revision with a bipolar prosthesis; the fourth patient
with a lag screw cutout refused revision. Fracture impaction was 13 &amp;plusmn;
15 mm in group A and 10 &amp;plusmn; 7 mm in group B, and the average tip apex
distance (TAD) was 22 &amp;plusmn; 4 mm in group A and 23 &amp;plusmn; 5 mm in group
B, which were not significant. No differences in the percentages indicating
&amp;quot;at risk&amp;quot; (TAD _ 25 mm) or &amp;quot;not at risk&amp;quot; (TAD _ 25 mm)
for cutout were found between the two groups. In both the standard and HA-coated
group, no patient with a TAD _ 25 mm experienced cutout. In the standard
group, patients experiencing cutout all had a TAD greater than 25 mm. However,
no patients in the HA-coated screw group with a TAD greater than 25 mm experienced
cutout. At 6 months, the Harris Hip Score was 63 &amp;plusmn; 22 (group A) and
71 &amp;plusmn; 18 (group B) ( P = 0.02); The SF-36 score was 56 &amp;plusmn;
24 (group A) and 62 &amp;plusmn; 19 (group B), which was not significantly different.
Postoperative neck-shaft angle was 134 &amp;plusmn; 5&amp;deg; in group A and 134
&amp;plusmn; 7&amp;deg; in group B, but, at the 6-month follow-up, it was 129 &amp;plusmn;
7&amp;deg; (group A) and 133 &amp;plusmn; 7&amp;deg; (group B) ( P = 0.008). Discussion: HA-coated AO/ASIF screws optimize DHS fixation and
clinical outcome of patients with osteoporotic trochanteric fractures. These
superior clinical results suggest that HA-coated implants could be the key
to improving fixation in mechanically weak bone. </description>
<pubDate>2005-11-03 23:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=9074</guid>
<author></author>
</item><item>
<title>Outcome after Arthrolysis of the Hip for Severe Heterotopic Ossification</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/9045.html</link>
<description> OTA 2002 - Session 2 Session II - Post-Traumatic Reconstruction Fri., 10/11/02 Post Traumatic Reconstruction, Paper #9, 3:00 PM Outcome after Arthrolysis of the Hip for Severe Heterotopic Ossification
and Ankylosis Michael Skutek, MD ; Stefan Hanning; Ulrich Bosch, MD;
Christian Krettek, MD, FRACS; Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical
School, Hannover, Germany Purpose: The aim of this clinical study was to determine and evaluate
the outcome after arthrolysis of the hip for severe heterotopic ossification
(HO) and ankylosis. Methods: Twenty-seven hips in 20 patients (5 women and 15 men
with an average age of 43.25 &amp;plusmn; 15.07 years) with HO Brooker grade
3 ( N = 10 ) and 4 ( N = 17) were included. All patients underwent
open surgical arthrolysis between 1990 and 1997 at our institution. Arthrolysis
was performed 21.3 &amp;plusmn; 16.6 months (range, 6 to 60) after diagnosis
of HO. Postoperatively, all patients received prophylaxis with Indomethacin
for 6 weeks. Additionally, two patients were radiated. Outcome evaluation
comprised clinical outcome and evaluation with use of the Merle d&#039;Aubigne,
Harris Hip, and the Lower Limb scores to cover all effects caused by this
severe complication. Results: The overall scores at the latest follow-up (5 &amp;plusmn;
3 years) were 6.8 &amp;plusmn; 3.5 (Merle-d&#039;Aubigne), 60.7 &amp;plusmn; 20.7 (Harris
Hip), and 77.2 &amp;plusmn; 20.7 (Lower-Limb). There was a mean correlation
between the interval (diagnosis to time of operation) and the score results
(Merle-d&#039;Aubigne and Harris-Hip Score) of r = &amp;shy;0.54, respectively.
The mean hip flexion was 55.5&amp;deg; &amp;plusmn; 35.1&amp;deg; and correlated negatively
with the interval ( r = &amp;shy;0.66). Discussion/Conclusions: There were satisfying results after operative
arthrolysis for heterotopic ossification and ankylosis. However, functional
results deteriorated with an increasing interval (diagnosis to arthrolysis).
After consideration of all contraindications, operative arthrolysis should
be performed as early as possible after diagnosis of HO. The results of
this study do not support the previous hypothesis that early arthrolysis
results in recurrence of impaired hip function. </description>
<pubDate>2005-11-01 23:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=9045</guid>
<author></author>
</item><item>
<title>Outcomes after Hip Fracture</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/9077.html</link>
<description> OTA 2002 - Session 6 Session VI - Geriatrics Sat., 10/12/02 Geriatrics, Paper #40, 11:44 AM Outcomes after Hip Fracture: The Results of a Prospective Multicenter
Database Kenneth J. Koval, MD ; Andrew L. Chen, MD; Ethan A. Halm,
MD; Sean R. Morrison, MD; Mary Ann McLaughlin, MD; Gretchen Orosz, MD; Jay
Magaziner, PhD; Albert Siu, MD, Hospital for Joint Diseases-New York University,
New York, New York, USA </description>
<pubDate>2005-11-03 23:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=9077</guid>
<author></author>
</item><item>
<title>Randomized Trial of Reduction and Fixation versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/9078.html</link>
<description> OTA 2002 - Session 6 Session VI - Geriatrics Sat., 10/12/02 Geriatrics, Paper #41, 11:53 AM Randomized Trial of Reduction and Fixation versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty
versus Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Subcapital Fractures in the
Fit Older Patient John F. Keating, FRCSEd (Orth) ; Moyra A. Masson, RGN;
John F. Forbes, PhD; Neil W. Scott, PhD; Adrian Grant, PhD; Multicentre
trial coordinated by Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, United Kingdom </description>
<pubDate>2005-11-03 23:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=9078</guid>
<author></author>
</item><item>
<title>Salvage of Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/9075.html</link>
<description> OTA 2002 - Session 6 Session VI - Geriatrics Sat., 10/12/02 Geriatrics, Paper #38, 11:21 AM Salvage of Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures:
Revision Internal Fixation or Hip Arthroplasty? George J. Haidukewych, MD ; Daniel J. Berry, MD; Mayo
Clinic and Mayo Foundation; Rochester, Minnesota, USA </description>
<pubDate>2005-11-03 23:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=9075</guid>
<author></author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
