<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>OWL: OCOSH Classification/Bone Diseases/Spinal Diseases/Spinal Deformity/Scoliosis/Abstracts</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com</link>
<description>Abstracts of scientific articles and presentations on scoliosis</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun Jan 13 2008 17:15:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 OWL Inc.</copyright>
<managingEditor>orthopaedicweblinks@gmail.com (Christian Veillette)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>orthopaedicweblinks@gmail.com (OWL Inc.)</webMaster>
<item>
<title>2005 Apical Sublaminar Wires versus Pedicle Screws AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12351.html</link>
<description>Apical Sublaminar Wires versus Pedicle Screws-Which Provides Better AIS Corrective Results?
Paper No: 290
Friday, February 25, 2005
11:00 AM - 11:06 AM
Lawrence G Lenke, MD Saint Louis MO (*)
Moderator(s):
Edward D Simmons, MD Buffalo NY
Susan E Stephens, MD Cleveland OH
Spine
Apical SLW and PS instrumentation both safely offer similar curve correction. Although more expensive, PS constructs had significantly less blood </description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12351</guid>
<author>Lenke</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Comparison of ASF versus PSF with Thoracic Pedicle Screws for Treatment of Lenke I AIS Curves AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12364.html</link>
<description>Poster Board Number: P301
Spine
Benjamin Potter, MD Washington DC (n)
Lawrence G Lenke, MD Saint Louis MO (a,e -medtronic sofamor danek)
Timothy R Kuklo, MD Rockville MD (a-Medtronic Sofamor danek)
We compared 20 ASF patients with Lenke type I AIS to 20 curve-matched patients treated with PSF with thoracic pedicle screws (TPS). PSF/TPS demonstrated greater MT (p=0.009) and TL-L curve correction (p=0.03), as well as greater improvement in rotation and thoracic torsion as assessed by correction of rib hump (p=0.005) and the apical vertebral body-rib ratio (p&lt;0.0001). </description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12364</guid>
<author>Potter et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Comparison of Combined ASF/PSF versus PSF Alone for the Treatment of AIS Curves greater than 90 AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12362.html</link>
<description>Comparison of Combined ASF/PSF versus PSF Alone for the Treatment of AIS Curves &gt; 90?
Poster Board Number: P298
Spine
Lawrence G Lenke, MD Saint Louis MO (n)
Michael Peelle, MD Saint Louis MO (n)
Keith H Bridwell, MD Saint Louis MO (n)
Matthew Barrett Dobbs, MD Saint Louis MO (n)
The use of PSF alone with an all pedicle screw construct provides the same correction in patients with AIS curves &gt; 90° as the circumferential ASF/PSF approach. </description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12362</guid>
<author>Lenke et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Comparison of Pedicle Screw versus Hybrid Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12350.html</link>
<description>Comparison of Pedicle Screw versus Hybrid Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Paper No: 289
Friday, February 25, 2005
10:54 AM - 11:00 AM
Yong Jung Kim, MD Saint Louis MO (n)
Lawrence G Lenke, MD Saint Louis MO (a - Medtronic Sofamor Danek)
Keith H Bridwell, MD Saint Louis MO (a - Medtronic Sofamor Danek)
Junghoon Kim, MD Saint Louis MO (n)
Samuel Cho, MD Saint Louis MO (n)
Moderator(s):
Edward D Simmons, MD Buffalo NY
Susan E Stephens, MD Cleveland OH
Spine
Pedicle screw instrumentation offers a significantly better major curve correction and slightly improved postoperative pulmonary function compared to hybrid constructs. </description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12350</guid>
<author>Kim et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Comparison of Single and Dual Growing Rod Techniques Followed through Definitive Surgery AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12344.html</link>
<description>Abstract Paper No: 265
Thursday, February 24, 2005
04:42 PM - 04:48 PM
George H Thompson, MD Cleveland OH (n)
Behrooz A Akbarnia, MD La Jolla CA (d,e-DePuy)
Patricia Nieman Kostial, RN (n)
Connie Poe-Kochert, RN Cleveland OH (n)
Douglas G Armstrong, MD Cleveland OH (n)
Jeffrey Roh, MD New York NY (n)
Robert Lowe, MD Chicago IL (n)
Marc Addason Asher, MD Kansas City KS (d,e-DePuy)
David S Marks, FRCS Birmingham, England United Kingdom (d,e-DePuy)
Growing rod techniques using single or dual rods are effective in controlling curve progression, providing correction and allowing for some spinal growth. The results of dual rod instrumentation were better than single rod instrumentation. This is due to a stronger construct and more frequent lengthenings. The worst results occurred in those who had a short apical fusion. We feel this should no longer be utilized, as it appears to predispose to stiffening of the curve, crankshaft phenomena, less correction, and increased incidence of complications</description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12344</guid>
<author>Thompson et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Comprehensive Analysis of Correction in Adults with Scoliosis Treated with Surgery to the Sacropelvis AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12356.html</link>
<description>Abstract Paper No: 300
Friday, February 25, 2005
12:18 PM - 12:24 PM
Matthew J Mermer, MD Coos Bay OR (*)
Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, MD New York NY (*)
Bernard A Rawlins, MD New York NY (*)
Melissa Peskin, BA (*)
Ramil S Bhatnagar, MD Sea Girt NJ (*)
Moderator(s):
Edward D Simmons, MD Buffalo NY
Susan E Stephens, MD Cleveland OH
Spine
Modular correction to the sacropelvis can reliably provide three-dimensional deformity reconstruction and achieve optimum balance in all planes. </description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12356</guid>
<author>Mermer et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Corrective Capacity of Monaxial versus Multiaxial Thoracic Pedicle Screws in AIS AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12363.html</link>
<description>Corrective Capacity of Monaxial versus Multiaxial Thoracic Pedicle Screws in AIS
Poster Board Number: P300
Spine
Benjamin Potter, MD Washington DC (n)
David W Polly Jr, MD Minneapolis MN (a,b,e-medtronic sofamor danek)
Lawrence G Lenke, MD Saint Louis MO (a,e-medtronic sofamor danek)
Timothy R Kuklo, MD Rockville MD (a- medtronic sofamor danek)
We compared 15 patients treated with monaxial versus 15 patients treated with multiaxial thoracic pedicle screws for AIS (Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis). Coronal curve correction was similar between the two groups (mon 61% vs. multi 62%); however, monaxial screws provided greater correction and vertebral rotation and thoracic torsion as assessed by improvement in rib hump (68% vs. 33%; p &lt; 0.0001), apical vertebral body-rib ratio (81% vs. 65%; p = 0.10), and apical rib spread difference (79% vs. 52%; p = 0.11)</description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12363</guid>
<author>Potter et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Dual Growing Rods for Treatment of Progressive Early Onset Scoliosis</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12347.html</link>
<description>Dual Growing Rods for Treatment of Progressive Early Onset Scoliosis: A Multicenter Study
Paper No: 286
Friday, February 25, 2005
10:30 AM - 10:36 AM
Behrooz A Akbarnia, MD La Jolla CA (c,e DePuy Spine)
David S Marks, FRCS Birmingham, England United Kingdom (c,e DePuy Spine)
Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, MD New York NY (c,e DePuy Spine)
Alistair G Thompson, FRCS Birmingham United Kingdom (n)
Marc Addason Asher, MD Kansas City KS (c,e DePuy Spine)
This is the first report of patients treated surgically with dual growing rods with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. The authors believe that the dual rod technique is safe and effective, provides superior stability, reduces complications and allows continued spinal growth in this challenging patient population. </description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12347</guid>
<author>Akbarnia et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Galveston Fixation in Neuromuscular Scoliosis AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12360.html</link>
<description>Galveston Fixation in Neuromuscular Scoliosis: The Gold Standard for New Instrumentation to Beat
Poster Board Number: P291
Spine
Stephen Storer, MD Hollywood FL (none)
Lauren Friend, MD New Orleans LA (none)
Vernon T Tolo, MD Los Angeles CA (none)
David Lee Skaggs, MD Los Angeles CA (a - Depuy, a,b - Synthese spine, a,b,e - Stryker Spine)
In this population of children with neuromuscular scoliosis, the Galveston technique was successful with few complications.</description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12360</guid>
<author>Storer et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 How Can New Radiological Technologies Help in the Diagnosis of Congenital Scoliosis AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12357.html</link>
<description>Poster Board Number: P209
Pediatrics
Paloma Bas Hermida, MD Valencia Spain (n)
Eva Llopis, MD Valencia Spain (n)
Jose Luis Bas, MD Madrid Spain (n)
Pilar Ferrer, MD Valencia Spain (n)
Teresa Bas, MD Valencia Spain (*)
The entire neural axis should be evaluated to rule out multiple level spinal cord abnormalities. Multiplanar reformatted images with MRI and specially CT improved identification of the vertebral anomaly and provide a three dimensional view of the malformation. </description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12357</guid>
<author>Hermida et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Loss of Coronal Correction Following Instrumentation Removal in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12352.html</link>
<description>Paper No: 291
Friday, February 25, 2005
11:06 AM - 11:12 AM
Timothy R Kuklo, MD Rockville MD (a- Medtronic Sofamor Danek)
Kevin L Kirk, DO Silver Spring MD (n)
Suken A Shah, MD Wilmington DE (n)
Moderator(s):
Edward D Simmons, MD Buffalo NY
Susan E Stephens, MD Cleveland OH
Spine
Twenty-one AIS patients were followed for an average of 5.2 years after instrumentation removal for either pain or infection. In this series, instrumentation removal was not found to be a benign process, as this cohort of patients shows a &quot;settling&quot; effect in the coronal plane of the MT and TL-L curves after instrumentation removal. Interestingly, there was no change in the sagittal plane with time. Parents and patients should be counseled for this when instrumentation removal is contemplated. </description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12352</guid>
<author>Kuklo et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Mini-Open Thoracotomy versus Thoracoscopic Release in Thoracic Scoliosis and Kyphosis AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12358.html</link>
<description>Poster Board Number: P283
Spine
Rafael Levin, MD New York NY (n)
Amir Hasharoni, MD Tel-Aviv Israel (n)
Baron Lonner, MD New York NY (n)
Thomas J Errico, MD New York NY (n)
David M Matusz, MD Baltimore MD (n)
A retrospective review of operative and radiographic results in 45 patients who underwent either MOTA (Mini-Open Thoracotomy) or VATS (Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery) for release and fusion prior to posterior instrumented fusion.</description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12358</guid>
<author>Levin et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Natural History and Results of Surgical Treatment of Patients with Fused Ribs and Congenital Scoliosis AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12343.html</link>
<description>Abstract Paper No: 264
Thursday, February 24, 2005
04:30 PM - 04:36 PM
Emilie V Cheung-Moore, MD Wynnewood PA (n)
James T Guille, MD Wilmington DE (n)
Randal R Betz, MD Ocean City NJ (n)
Mary Jane Mulcahey-Hershey, OT Philadelphia PA (n)
Linda P D&#039;Andrea, MD Blue Bell PA (n)
Janet Cerrone, PA-C Philadelphia PA (n)
Robert Murray Campbell Jr, MD San Antonio TX (n)
Charles Eugene Johnston II, MD Dallas TX (n)
John Peter Lubicky, MD Chicago IL (n)
Conclusion: In children with both fused ribs and congenital scoliosis, Cobb angle and shortened thoracic height progresses in severity with growth. Our results suggest that corrective osteotomy gives the best chance of improving the Cobb angle but results in the greatest reduction in thoracic spinal height.</description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12343</guid>
<author>Cheung-Moore et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Pelvic Fixation in Spine Surgery AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12369.html</link>
<description>Pelvic Fixation in Spine Surgery: Historical Overview, Indications, Biomechanical Relevance, and Current Techniques
Scientific Exhibitor Number: SE067
Spine
Ali Moshirfar, MD Silver Spring MD (None)
Frank F Rand, MD Boston MA (e - DePuy Spine, Stryker Spine)
Paul D Sponseller, MD Baltimore MD (None)
Stephen J Parazin, MD Chestnut Hill MA (e - DePuy Spine, Kyphon, Smith &amp; Nephew)
A Jay Khanna, MD Baltimore MD (None)
Khaled M- Kebaish, MD Baltimore MD (None)
John Thomas Stinson, MD Rockville MD (None)
Pelvic fixation allows for protection of distal S1 pedicle screws to prevent pseudoarthrosis in long fusions to the sacrum.
&lt;br&gt;Pelvic fixation is necessary for long fusions of the spine ending at S-1. This exhibit reviews the common pathologic conditions and indications, biomechanical basis, and surgical steps necessary to place pelvic implants safely. </description>
<pubDate>2007-08-01 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12369</guid>
<author>Moshirfar et al</author>
</item><item>
<title>2005 Postoperative Pancreatitis after Spinal Surgery and the Increased Risk of Sepsis and Wound Infection AAOS</title>
<link>http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/Detailed/12346.html</link>
<description>Paper No: 268
Thursday, February 24, 2005
05:06 PM - 05:12 PM
Suken A Shah, MD Wilmington DE (n)
Zhaoping He, PhD Wilmington DE (n)
Kirk W Dabney, MD Wilmington DE (n)
Freeman Miller, MD Wilmington DE (n)
Devendra I Mehta, MD Wilmington DE (n)
Postoperative acute pancreatitis is strongly associated with sepsis and wound infection within a few days after spinal surgery. The purpose of the study was to determine if postoperative pancreatitis increases a patient&#039;s risk of developing an infection.
&lt;BR&gt;Postoperative acute pancreatitis is strongly associated with sepsis within a few days, suggesting a causal association</description>
<pubDate>2007-07-31 17:15:21 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthopaedicweblinks.com/cgi-bin/owl/jump.cgi?ID=12346</guid>
<author>Shah et al</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>