
reverberisandro at gmail
New User
Jan 30, 2008, 7:19 AM
Post #1 of 1
(156 views)
Shortcut
|
|
[Orthopod] Re: post-nailing fracture
|
Can't Post
|
|
dear Gaurav, your thinkings are exactly my opinions ; I have removed the nail and by the same approach I have done a osteosynthesis by an anterograd Grosse-Kenpf nail. Minimal exposition of the fracture was necessary to remove distal screws and so we put a Lambotte's clamp to mantain the reduction till distal stabilization. The reduction wasn't optimal (a little valgus) but I think it was the best biological solution to this hard problem. I thank you all for your suggestions, Sandro Reverberi On 29 Gen, 15:39, Gaurav N Bhalla Orthopaedic Surgeon Kanpur India <drgauravbhalla2...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > This is a very nice discussion. If I may comment - > 1. I feel that the option of exchanging this nail with a similar, > longer nail with multiplanar distal locking screws is the most > biologic option and the removal of this nail should not be much of a > problem. > 2. The total time taken and the blood loss in this surgery should not > be more than the other 2 options, in fact if all goes well it may be > quicker as the approach is smaller and the closure will take lesser > time. > 3. The only compromise over the locking plate is the purchase in the > distal fragment, but once the locking bolts are in place the purchase > should be enough for at least wheel chair mobility and isometric and > isotonic Quads. > 4. The rehabilitation time and the knee stiffness should also be the > least with this method. > 5. Bone healing (union) should be fast as it is a long spiral > metaphyseal-diaphyseal # and using this fixation the fracture site > will not be opened. > 6. The screw in the neck will prevent (prophylactic fixation) a neck > fracture in this already osteopototic bone. > 7. Of course medical management for osteoporosis must be initiated, I > do not consider any need for cement. > Thank you all. > > On Jan 16, 9:17 pm, "reverberi sandro" <reverberisan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > I should like know what is your preferred treatment for this fracture at the > > tip of a long Gamma nail (on a healed subtrocantheric fracture : see img > > tmgn00a). > > The patient is a 81 years old lady with osteoporosis and important knee > > arthrosis (as you can see). > > Do you remove the nail or not? can we obtain a stable ostheosynthesis with a > > plate without remove the nail? > > Do you prefer to apply a plate or an endomedullary nail (along the old way > > of gamma nail) to preserve joint motion? > > It is justified to apply bone cement in the bone loss ? > > Best regards > > Sandro Reverberi > > Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova > > Reggio Emilia > > Italy > > > tmgn3.jpg > > 74KViewDownload > > > tmgn2.jpg > > 45KViewDownload > > > tmgn00a.jpg > > 16KViewDownload- Nascondi testo tra virgolette - > > - Mostra testo tra virgolette - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Orthopod Mailing List. To post to this group, send email to orthopod@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to orthopod-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/orthopod?hl=en --- Powered by Orthogate Improving orthopaedic care, education, and research using Internet technologies http://www.orthogate.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|