
alex61 at gmail
New User
Jun 2, 2007, 2:02 AM
Post #1 of 1
(439 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re[2]: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
|
Can't Post
|
|
Dear Dan Friday, June 1, 2007 7:41:57 PM dan wrote: > pelvic ex-fix is a good option in these situations. in dwelling We receive many patients from somewhere else, 3-4 weeks after the injury or later, with SP tube in place and neglected pelvis. We of course use external fixators for closed reduction and temporary and sometimes definitive stabilization of the pelvis. But often displaced fragments of the rami are out of control with conventional frames. Its closed reduction by an additional assembly is tricky, and it requires to place some half-pins close to the SP tube. Time to frame removal can be long. In our settings patients are referred to other institutions for urological part of the job. And many urologists are extremely reluctant to take patients with pelvic frames. Also they feel ready to perform urethra repair _after_ reduction and either internal fixation or healing of the anterior part of the ring. This is background of my question. --- Best regards, Alexander N. Chelnokov Ural Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics 7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
|