
jjbrooksmd at gmail
New User
Apr 7, 2007, 7:52 AM
Post #2 of 3
(260 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [ORT-L] Pregnancy with # Capitellum
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
I vote for ORIF, ASAP. Lateral approach. Radius is sagging/dislocated out the back. Simple excision of the capitellar fragment will lead to a posteropateral rotatory instabiliby pattern. Pre & postop OB evaluation/fetal monitoring of their choice. GA in the 3rd trimester of an uncomplicated pregnancy in a low-risk mom (I assume this is the case??) is fairly straightforward. Waiting will only make matters worse. She's going to need a good elbow to care for her baby! Jeffrey J. Brooks, MD Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery Stamford, CT On Apr 7, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Dr Harpal Singh Selhi wrote: > Dear All, > > I have a patient with Displaced # capitellum 10 days old, treated with > massage by a bone setter for 6 days. > > Patient is pregnant in her 9th month. > > I seek ur opinion regarding > > > Should I intervene or postpone? > > Intervention should be to excise the fragment or internally fix it? > > I consulted the obs and anes consultant, they feel not much risk in > anesthesia as she is beyond 37 weeks, so even she goes into premature > labour, should not be a problem. > > Kindly suggest the line of management > > > Harpal > > Dr Harpal Singh Selhi > (Adult Joint Recon, Sports and Hand Surgery) > > Associate Prof of Ortho Surgery, > DMC & Hospital, Ludhiana (INDIA) > > Resi: > 527-L, Model Town, Ludhiana-141002 (Punjab) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ORT-L-owner@www2.aaos.org [mailto:ORT-L-owner@www2.aaos.org] > On Behalf > Of Alexander Chelnokov > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 4:22 PM > To: Rob Schultz > Subject: Re: [ORT-L] infected nonunions > > Hello Rob, > > Wednesday, April 4, 2007, 8:18:23 AM, you wrote: > > RS> Please help me find info on the debridement/placement of abx > PMMA in > RS> infected long bone defects followed by autogenous graft. Did Dr. > Lindsay do > > J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Nov-Dec;16(10):723-9. > > Intramedullary infections treated with antibiotic cement rods: > preliminary > results in nine cases. > > Paley D, Herzenberg JE. > > Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthpaedics, International Center for > Limb > Lengthening, Baltimore, Maryland 21215, USA. > dpaley@lifebridgehealth.org > > The treatment of intramedullary infections after nailing usually > includes > removal of the rod, debridement of the canal, and, in many cases, > insertion > of > antibiotic-impregnated cement beads. These beads offer no > mechanical support > and > are difficult to remove if left in place for more than 2 weeks. We > present > an > alternative for filling the medullary canal's noncollapsible dead > space with > an > antibiotic-impregnated cement rod. This rod can be custom-made at > the time > of > surgery, using different diameter chest tubes as molds and > embedding a 3-mm > beaded guidewire within the cement. The smooth molded surface of > this nail > makes > extraction of the cement rod relatively easy. The cement rod also > provides > some > limited temporary support to the fracture or nonunion site while the > infection > is being treated. After 6 weeks, the rod can be removed and > replaced with a > definitive metal intramedullary nail, with or without bone grafting > to treat > the > previously infected fracture or nonunion site. We retrospectively > reviewed > nine > cases of intramedullary infection treated with antibiotic- > impregnated molded > cement rods. These included six femora, two tibiae, and one > humerus. The > cause > of infection was lengthening or transport over nail in six cases, > fixator-augmented nailing of osteotomies in two, and fracture > fixation in > one. > The follow-up period after surgery ranged from 38 to 48 months. No > recurrent > infection occurred during this follow-up period, and no patient > required > antibiotics after the rod was removed. In all cases, the canal > cultures were > negative after rod removal. The cement rod was removed between 29 > and 753 > days > after implantation. Fracture of the rod occurred in one case in > which the > rod > was left in place for more than 1 year. We conclude that this > method is a > relatively simple and inexpensive alternative for the treatment of > intramedullary infections. > > > > -- > Best regards, > Alexander N. Chelnokov > Ural Scientific Research Institute > of Traumatology and Orthopaedics > 7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia > > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > <capitellum.jpg> Jeffrey J Brooks, MD Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports medicine center 1290 Summer Street, #4400 Stamford, CT 06905 (203) 323-7331 The information contained in this electronic mail transmittal may contain healthcare information and is protected by law. This message is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or duplication of its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the transmittal immediately. Thank you. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
|