Main Index MAIN
INDEX
Search Posts SEARCH
POSTS
Who's Online WHO'S
ONLINE
Log in LOG
IN

Forum: OWL Lists: OTA:
[ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?

 

 


alex at orto
New User

May 31, 2007, 3:17 AM

Post #1 of 17 (2745 views)
Shortcut
[ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? Can't Post

Dear colleagues,

If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
measures to prevent infection? THX!

--
Best regards,
Alexander N. Chelnokov
Ural Scientific Research Institute
of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



Bruce_Ziran at HMIS
New User

May 31, 2007, 5:07 AM

Post #2 of 17 (2745 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

This has been a dilemma for me. I have done it but have used absorbable
antibiotic beads (CaSu + tobra + vanco) and then cover with atb for a
longer period. I would expect a higher but still acceptable rate of
infection and then be prepared to remove hardware when healed. I would be
interested in others views.

Bruce H. Ziran, M.D.
Director of Orthopaedic Trauma
St. Elizabeth Health Center
Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
Northeast Ohio Universities College of Medicine



Alexander
Chelnokov
<alex@orto.unets. To
ru> ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
Sent by: cc
ORT-L-owner@www2.
aaos.org Subject
[ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?

05/31/2007 06:17
AM


Please respond to
ORT-L@www2.aaos.o
rg






Dear colleagues,

If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
measures to prevent infection? THX!

--
Best regards,
Alexander N. Chelnokov
Ural Scientific Research Institute
of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



danschlatterer at yahoo
New User

Jun 1, 2007, 6:41 AM

Post #3 of 17 (2730 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

hello to all,
pelvic ex-fix is a good option in these situations. in dwelling catheters for any lengthy time
period are significant risk for infections (including foley catheters placed for weeks for
urethral injuries). resorbable beads develop a fluid which is hard to interpret in terms of the
"drainage" they can produce. the fluid always looks like infection although it may just be the
beads resorbing. the infection is from the catheter and placing antibiotics around the plate may
help locally but will not prevent infection since the origin/pathway is remote from the surgical
site. I have a case myself currently where a pt initially had a suprapubic catheter for 5 days and
then urology exchanged for a foley catheter (pt had a urethral tear and APC II pelvis). I placed a
supra-acetabular pelvic ex-fix at admission to close the pelvis. a week after the suprapubic
catheter was removed I went back and plated the pubic symphysis. 4 wks later the pt returned to
the office with very cloudy fluid in the foley and drainage from the pubic incision. urology says
the foley got clogged and caused urine to come out of the urethral tear and into my surgical area.
so now I am comfronted with an infection of the pubic region. so to me in dwelling catheters for
lengthy time periods are risky. it sounds as if the matta group has a different experience which
we would be interested in hearing more about. thanks
dan schlatterer
--- Bruce_Ziran@HMIS.ORG wrote:

> This has been a dilemma for me. I have done it but have used absorbable
> antibiotic beads (CaSu + tobra + vanco) and then cover with atb for a
> longer period. I would expect a higher but still acceptable rate of
> infection and then be prepared to remove hardware when healed. I would be
> interested in others views.
>
> Bruce H. Ziran, M.D.
> Director of Orthopaedic Trauma
> St. Elizabeth Health Center
> Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
> Northeast Ohio Universities College of Medicine
>
>
>
> Alexander
> Chelnokov
> <alex@orto.unets. To
> ru> ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> Sent by: cc
> ORT-L-owner@www2.
> aaos.org Subject
> [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
>
> 05/31/2007 06:17
> AM
>
>
> Please respond to
> ORT-L@www2.aaos.o
> rg
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
> reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
> measures to prevent infection? THX!
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alexander N. Chelnokov
> Ural Scientific Research Institute
> of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
> 7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
> is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>


Daniel Schlatterer, DO
Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
Director, Orthopaedic Trauma
Atlanta Medical Center
303 Parkway Dr. NE
Atlanta, GA 30312
404-265-1578



____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



Bruce_Ziran at HMIS
New User

Jun 1, 2007, 8:48 AM

Post #4 of 17 (2730 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

The absorbable beads are osmotic and may develop a seroma. We are
publishing such in J Trauma, in galleys now, but having said that, the
seroma can be prevented/controlled. THe one thing for sure in this
situation is that one must accept that by definition, the space of Retzius
and any metal in this area will be colonized with bacteria. On the other
hand, colonization does not equal infection. For that reason, even if a SP
catheter is changed, all that does is lower the CFU load available to
colonize or infect the tissue bed. It is like fighting terrorists in the
mountains and caves. They hide all over and no matter how much one bombs,
napalms or whatever, there is always some left behind to re-colonize. I
would suspect that even so, the reason Matta has such good results is that
the true infection rate is still low. Unfortunately, with infection, the
incidence is so low, that the numbers required to get a sufficiently
powered analysis is too large. Imagine in their series if they have 25
without infection, but the 26th is the one that gets it. That is a 4% rate,
as compared with an expected 1% incidence. While 400% greater infection
rate, it is still low enough to consider doing.

I would agree with dan but beleive the matta approach is quite reasonable.
Also, consider that a pelvic ex fix is quite difficult to maintain. I am a
big fan of exfix and frames, but I hate pelvic fixators and have not had
good success with the pins for longer periods. I like the idea of trying to
get rid of the SP altogether and changing to a foley if possible. But if
forced to place anteriorly, I would use ATB beads.

Bruce H. Ziran, M.D.
Director of Orthopaedic Trauma
St. Elizabeth Health Center
Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
Northeast Ohio Universities College of Medicine



dan schlatterer
<danschlatterer@y
ahoo.com> To
Sent by: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
ORT-L-owner@www2. cc
aaos.org
Subject
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic
06/01/2007 09:41 tube?
AM


Please respond to
ORT-L@www2.aaos.o
rg






hello to all,
pelvic ex-fix is a good option in these situations. in dwelling catheters
for any lengthy time
period are significant risk for infections (including foley catheters
placed for weeks for
urethral injuries). resorbable beads develop a fluid which is hard to
interpret in terms of the
"drainage" they can produce. the fluid always looks like infection although
it may just be the
beads resorbing. the infection is from the catheter and placing antibiotics
around the plate may
help locally but will not prevent infection since the origin/pathway is
remote from the surgical
site. I have a case myself currently where a pt initially had a suprapubic
catheter for 5 days and
then urology exchanged for a foley catheter (pt had a urethral tear and APC
II pelvis). I placed a
supra-acetabular pelvic ex-fix at admission to close the pelvis. a week
after the suprapubic
catheter was removed I went back and plated the pubic symphysis. 4 wks
later the pt returned to
the office with very cloudy fluid in the foley and drainage from the pubic
incision. urology says
the foley got clogged and caused urine to come out of the urethral tear and
into my surgical area.
so now I am comfronted with an infection of the pubic region. so to me in
dwelling catheters for
lengthy time periods are risky. it sounds as if the matta group has a
different experience which
we would be interested in hearing more about. thanks
dan schlatterer
--- Bruce_Ziran@HMIS.ORG wrote:

> This has been a dilemma for me. I have done it but have used absorbable
> antibiotic beads (CaSu + tobra + vanco) and then cover with atb for a
> longer period. I would expect a higher but still acceptable rate of
> infection and then be prepared to remove hardware when healed. I would be
> interested in others views.
>
> Bruce H. Ziran, M.D.
> Director of Orthopaedic Trauma
> St. Elizabeth Health Center
> Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
> Northeast Ohio Universities College of Medicine
>
>
>

> Alexander

> Chelnokov

> <alex@orto.unets.
To
> ru> ORT-L@www2.aaos.org

> Sent by:
cc
> ORT-L-owner@www2.

> aaos.org
Subject
> [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?

>

> 05/31/2007 06:17

> AM

>

>

> Please respond to

> ORT-L@www2.aaos.o

> rg

>

>

>
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
> reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
> measures to prevent infection? THX!
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alexander N. Chelnokov
> Ural Scientific Research Institute
> of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
> 7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and
> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution
> is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the

> sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>


Daniel Schlatterer, DO
Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
Director, Orthopaedic Trauma
Atlanta Medical Center
303 Parkway Dr. NE
Atlanta, GA 30312
404-265-1578



____________________________________________________________________________________

Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



loisannnichols at hotmail
New User

Jun 3, 2007, 5:48 AM

Post #5 of 17 (2716 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

 
How can the seroma be prevented/controlled?

Lois Nichols

>From: Bruce_Ziran@HMIS.ORG
>Reply-To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
>To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
>Subject: Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
>Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:48:17 -0400
>
>The absorbable beads are osmotic and may develop a seroma. We are
>publishing such in J Trauma, in galleys now, but having said that, the
>seroma can be prevented/controlled. THe one thing for sure in this
>situation is that one must accept that by definition, the space of Retzius
>and any metal in this area will be colonized with bacteria. On the other
>hand, colonization does not equal infection. For that reason, even if a SP
>catheter is changed, all that does is lower the CFU load available to
>colonize or infect the tissue bed. It is like fighting terrorists in the
>mountains and caves. They hide all over and no matter how much one bombs,
>napalms or whatever, there is always some left behind to re-colonize. I
>would suspect that even so, the reason Matta has such good results is that
>the true infection rate is still low. Unfortunately, with infection, the
>incidence is so low, that the numbers required to get a sufficiently
>powered analysis is too large. Imagine in their series if they have 25
>without infection, but the 26th is the one that gets it. That is a 4% rate,
>as compared with an expected 1% incidence. While 400% greater infection
>rate, it is still low enough to consider doing.
>
>I would agree with dan but beleive the matta approach is quite reasonable.
>Also, consider that a pelvic ex fix is quite difficult to maintain. I am a
>big fan of exfix and frames, but I hate pelvic fixators and have not had
>good success with the pins for longer periods. I like the idea of trying to
>get rid of the SP altogether and changing to a foley if possible. But if
>forced to place anteriorly, I would use ATB beads.
>
>Bruce H. Ziran, M.D.
>Director of Orthopaedic Trauma
>St. Elizabeth Health Center
>Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
>Northeast Ohio Universities College of Medicine
>
>
>
> dan schlatterer
> <danschlatterer@y
> ahoo.com> To
> Sent by: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> ORT-L-owner@www2. cc
> aaos.org
> Subject
> Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic
> 06/01/2007 09:41 tube?
> AM
>
>
> Please respond to
> ORT-L@www2.aaos.o
> rg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>hello to all,
>pelvic ex-fix is a good option in these situations. in dwelling catheters
>for any lengthy time
>period are significant risk for infections (including foley catheters
>placed for weeks for
>urethral injuries). resorbable beads develop a fluid which is hard to
>interpret in terms of the
>"drainage" they can produce. the fluid always looks like infection although
>it may just be the
>beads resorbing. the infection is from the catheter and placing antibiotics
>around the plate may
>help locally but will not prevent infection since the origin/pathway is
>remote from the surgical
>site. I have a case myself currently where a pt initially had a suprapubic
>catheter for 5 days and
>then urology exchanged for a foley catheter (pt had a urethral tear and APC
>II pelvis). I placed a
>supra-acetabular pelvic ex-fix at admission to close the pelvis. a week
>after the suprapubic
>catheter was removed I went back and plated the pubic symphysis. 4 wks
>later the pt returned to
>the office with very cloudy fluid in the foley and drainage from the pubic
>incision. urology says
>the foley got clogged and caused urine to come out of the urethral tear and
>into my surgical area.
>so now I am comfronted with an infection of the pubic region. so to me in
>dwelling catheters for
>lengthy time periods are risky. it sounds as if the matta group has a
>different experience which
>we would be interested in hearing more about. thanks
>dan schlatterer
>--- Bruce_Ziran@HMIS.ORG wrote:
>
> > This has been a dilemma for me. I have done it but have used absorbable
> > antibiotic beads (CaSu + tobra + vanco) and then cover with atb for a
> > longer period. I would expect a higher but still acceptable rate of
> > infection and then be prepared to remove hardware when healed. I would
>be
> > interested in others views.
> >
> > Bruce H. Ziran, M.D.
> > Director of Orthopaedic Trauma
> > St. Elizabeth Health Center
> > Associate Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
> > Northeast Ohio Universities College of Medicine
> >
> >
> >
>
> > Alexander
>
> > Chelnokov
>
> > <alex@orto.unets.
>To
> > ru> ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
>
> > Sent by:
>cc
> > ORT-L-owner@www2.
>
> > aaos.org
>Subject
> > [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
>
> >
>
> > 05/31/2007 06:17
>
> > AM
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Please respond to
>
> > ORT-L@www2.aaos.o
>
> > rg
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
> > reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
> > measures to prevent infection? THX!
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Alexander N. Chelnokov
> > Ural Scientific Research Institute
> > of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
> > 7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is for
> > the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
>and
> > privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
>distribution
> > is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
>the
>
> > sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
> >
>
>
>Daniel Schlatterer, DO
>Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
>Director, Orthopaedic Trauma
>Atlanta Medical Center
>303 Parkway Dr. NE
>Atlanta, GA 30312
>404-265-1578
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
>Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
>---
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
>
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is for
>the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
>privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
>distribution
>is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
>---
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft
Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



mlroutt at u
New User

Jun 8, 2007, 12:52 PM

Post #6 of 17 (2586 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

Sorry to be late...here’s an old reference.

Chip





Internal fixation in pelvic fractures and primary repairs of associated
genitourinary disruptions: a team approach.
Routt ML, Simonian PT, Defalco AJ, Miller J, Clarke T.
Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle,
Washington 98104, USA.
Associated urological and orthopedic injuries of the pelvic ring are complex
with numerous potential complications. These patients are treated optimally
using a team approach. The combined expertise is not only helpful initially
when managing these difficult patients, but also later as problems develop.
This study describes a treatment protocol and reports the early results of
23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures and associated bladder or
urethral disruptions, or both, treated surgically with open reduction and
internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring injuries at the same
anesthetic and using the same surgical exposure as the urethral realignments
or bladder repairs or both. Early complications occurred in four patients
(17%): one patient sustained a fifth lumbar nerve injury caused by the
pelvic reduction procedure, and three patients had anterior pelvic internal
fixation failures. Late complications occurred in eight patients (35%).
There was one deep wound infection (4.3%) that presented 6 weeks after
injury. Late urological complications occurred in seven patients (30%). Four
of the nine male patients with urethral disruptions had urethral stricture
after their primary urethral realignments (44%). Three of the 18 male
patients admitted to impotence (16.7%). One of the three had a residual
thoracic paraplegia caused by a burst fracture. One of the five female
patients had urinary incontinence and required a bladder suspension
operation to restore normal function (20%). A low infection rate can be
expected despite the use of internal fixation. Early urethral "indirect"
realignments avoid more difficult delayed open repairs; however, late
urological complication rates are still high. Early "direct" bladder repairs
are easily performed at the time of anterior pelvic open reduction and
internal fixation. Suprapubic tubes are not necessary to adequately divert
the urine when large diameter urethral catheters are used in these patients.




> I'm currently working on a manuscript with Dr. Matta on this topic. his
> protocol which i use now is to prep the SP catheter into the field, do your
> normal approach, repair bladder as indicated and place a new SP catheter or
> foley.
>
> no other special measures
>
> no infections in 19 patients
>
> dave
>
>
>
> David P. Zamorano, MD
> Assistant Chief, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
> Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
> Harbor/UCLA Medical Center
> Office (310) 222-2716
> Fax (310) 533-8791
>
> dpzamorano@hotmail.com
>>
>> From: Alexander Chelnokov <alex@orto.unets.ru>
>> Reply-To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
>> To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
>> Subject: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
>> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:17:29 +0600
>>> >Dear colleagues,
>>> >
>>> >If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
>>> >reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
>>> >measures to prevent infection? THX!
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >Best regards,
>>> > Alexander N. Chelnokov
>>> >Ural Scientific Research Institute
>>> >of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
>>> >7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
>>> >
>>> >---
>>> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>>> >
>>
>>
>> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i‚m Initiative now.
>> It‚s free. <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2737??PS=47575> --- [This E-mail
>> scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
Harborview Medical Center
325 Ninth Avenue
Box 359798
Seattle, WA 98104-2499
phone 206-731-3658
FAX 206-731-3227
--




danschlatterer at yahoo
New User

Jun 11, 2007, 4:38 AM

Post #7 of 17 (2495 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

good morning to all,
attached are images of a 70 year old female after peds versus car. her own car ran her over.
injuries are limited to the pelvis. left rami open and visible in a 10cm vertical laceration just
lateral to left labia majora. wound is grossly clean. no vaginal and no urinary issues. CT scan
shows widening of both SI joints anteriorly but I think this is vertically stable pattern.

pt treated that night with I/D and supra-acetabular frame to close the
ring. consideration was given for SI screws bilateraly, but given time of night and other factors
decision made not to proceed.

so the question is what next operatively if anything? concerns
are infection, nonunion anteriorly and possible incompetence of the pelvic floor which may lead to
prolapse
issues. right rami are comminuted and plating may entail ilioinguinal approach to extend plate
laterally to right iliac wing. retrograde screw up right rami is an option but I am not convinced
it will add much. adding SI screws very doable, but major concern is restoring anterior ring. so
far wound is clean and closed over a drain, and I have no plans to open it back up and wash again.
maintaining pelvic alignment in ex-fix in 70 yo female for any length of time may be challenging.
any thoughts? would anyone plate the pubic symphysis to close the gap and leave the more lateral
rami fractures alone? the most recent pelvic case on this website involved pts with suprapubic
catheters and antibiotic options including resorbable beads. I wonder how many people would plate
and place antibiotic beads. thanks.

dan schlatterer

--- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:

> Sorry to be late...here’s an old reference.
>
> Chip
>
>
>
>
>
> Internal fixation in pelvic fractures and primary repairs of associated
> genitourinary disruptions: a team approach.
> Routt ML, Simonian PT, Defalco AJ, Miller J, Clarke T.
> Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle,
> Washington 98104, USA.
> Associated urological and orthopedic injuries of the pelvic ring are complex
> with numerous potential complications. These patients are treated optimally
> using a team approach. The combined expertise is not only helpful initially
> when managing these difficult patients, but also later as problems develop.
> This study describes a treatment protocol and reports the early results of
> 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures and associated bladder or
> urethral disruptions, or both, treated surgically with open reduction and
> internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring injuries at the same
> anesthetic and using the same surgical exposure as the urethral realignments
> or bladder repairs or both. Early complications occurred in four patients
> (17%): one patient sustained a fifth lumbar nerve injury caused by the
> pelvic reduction procedure, and three patients had anterior pelvic internal
> fixation failures. Late complications occurred in eight patients (35%).
> There was one deep wound infection (4.3%) that presented 6 weeks after
> injury. Late urological complications occurred in seven patients (30%). Four
> of the nine male patients with urethral disruptions had urethral stricture
> after their primary urethral realignments (44%). Three of the 18 male
> patients admitted to impotence (16.7%). One of the three had a residual
> thoracic paraplegia caused by a burst fracture. One of the five female
> patients had urinary incontinence and required a bladder suspension
> operation to restore normal function (20%). A low infection rate can be
> expected despite the use of internal fixation. Early urethral "indirect"
> realignments avoid more difficult delayed open repairs; however, late
> urological complication rates are still high. Early "direct" bladder repairs
> are easily performed at the time of anterior pelvic open reduction and
> internal fixation. Suprapubic tubes are not necessary to adequately divert
> the urine when large diameter urethral catheters are used in these patients.
>
>
>
>
> > I'm currently working on a manuscript with Dr. Matta on this topic. his
> > protocol which i use now is to prep the SP catheter into the field, do your
> > normal approach, repair bladder as indicated and place a new SP catheter or
> > foley.
> >
> > no other special measures
> >
> > no infections in 19 patients
> >
> > dave
> >
> >
> >
> > David P. Zamorano, MD
> > Assistant Chief, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
> > Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
> > Harbor/UCLA Medical Center
> > Office (310) 222-2716
> > Fax (310) 533-8791
> >
> > dpzamorano@hotmail.com
> >>
> >> From: Alexander Chelnokov <alex@orto.unets.ru>
> >> Reply-To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> >> To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> >> Subject: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
> >> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:17:29 +0600
> >>> >Dear colleagues,
> >>> >
> >>> >If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
> >>> >reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
> >>> >measures to prevent infection? THX!
> >>> >
> >>> >--
> >>> >Best regards,
> >>> > Alexander N. Chelnokov
> >>> >Ural Scientific Research Institute
> >>> >of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
> >>> >7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
> >>> >
> >>> >---
> >>> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >>> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i‚m Initiative now.
> >> It‚s free. <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2737??PS=47575> --- [This E-mail
> >> scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
> M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
> Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
> Harborview Medical Center
> 325 Ninth Avenue
> Box 359798
> Seattle, WA 98104-2499
> phone 206-731-3658
> FAX 206-731-3227
> --
>
>
>


Daniel Schlatterer, DO
Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
Director, Orthopaedic Trauma
Atlanta Medical Center
303 Parkway Dr. NE
Atlanta, GA 30312
404-265-1578



____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
Attachments: spradlin 2007 open.ppt (324 KB)


mlroutt at u
New User

Jun 11, 2007, 5:51 AM

Post #8 of 17 (2495 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

We'd need ct images to make reasonable recs.

Chip





> good morning to all,
> attached are images of a 70 year old female after peds versus car. her own car
> ran her over.
> injuries are limited to the pelvis. left rami open and visible in a 10cm
> vertical laceration just
> lateral to left labia majora. wound is grossly clean. no vaginal and no
> urinary issues. CT scan
> shows widening of both SI joints anteriorly but I think this is vertically
> stable pattern.
>
> pt treated that night with I/D and supra-acetabular frame to close the
> ring. consideration was given for SI screws bilateraly, but given time of
> night and other factors
> decision made not to proceed.
>
> so the question is what next operatively if anything? concerns
> are infection, nonunion anteriorly and possible incompetence of the pelvic
> floor which may lead to
> prolapse
> issues. right rami are comminuted and plating may entail ilioinguinal approach
> to extend plate
> laterally to right iliac wing. retrograde screw up right rami is an option but
> I am not convinced
> it will add much. adding SI screws very doable, but major concern is restoring
> anterior ring. so
> far wound is clean and closed over a drain, and I have no plans to open it
> back up and wash again.
> maintaining pelvic alignment in ex-fix in 70 yo female for any length of time
> may be challenging.
> any thoughts? would anyone plate the pubic symphysis to close the gap and
> leave the more lateral
> rami fractures alone? the most recent pelvic case on this website involved pts
> with suprapubic
> catheters and antibiotic options including resorbable beads. I wonder how many
> people would plate
> and place antibiotic beads. thanks.
>
> dan schlatterer
>
> --- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>> Sorry to be late...here’s an old reference.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Internal fixation in pelvic fractures and primary repairs of associated
>> genitourinary disruptions: a team approach.
>> Routt ML, Simonian PT, Defalco AJ, Miller J, Clarke T.
>> Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle,
>> Washington 98104, USA.
>> Associated urological and orthopedic injuries of the pelvic ring are complex
>> with numerous potential complications. These patients are treated optimally
>> using a team approach. The combined expertise is not only helpful initially
>> when managing these difficult patients, but also later as problems develop.
>> This study describes a treatment protocol and reports the early results of
>> 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures and associated bladder or
>> urethral disruptions, or both, treated surgically with open reduction and
>> internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring injuries at the same
>> anesthetic and using the same surgical exposure as the urethral realignments
>> or bladder repairs or both. Early complications occurred in four patients
>> (17%): one patient sustained a fifth lumbar nerve injury caused by the
>> pelvic reduction procedure, and three patients had anterior pelvic internal
>> fixation failures. Late complications occurred in eight patients (35%).
>> There was one deep wound infection (4.3%) that presented 6 weeks after
>> injury. Late urological complications occurred in seven patients (30%). Four
>> of the nine male patients with urethral disruptions had urethral stricture
>> after their primary urethral realignments (44%). Three of the 18 male
>> patients admitted to impotence (16.7%). One of the three had a residual
>> thoracic paraplegia caused by a burst fracture. One of the five female
>> patients had urinary incontinence and required a bladder suspension
>> operation to restore normal function (20%). A low infection rate can be
>> expected despite the use of internal fixation. Early urethral "indirect"
>> realignments avoid more difficult delayed open repairs; however, late
>> urological complication rates are still high. Early "direct" bladder repairs
>> are easily performed at the time of anterior pelvic open reduction and
>> internal fixation. Suprapubic tubes are not necessary to adequately divert
>> the urine when large diameter urethral catheters are used in these patients.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'm currently working on a manuscript with Dr. Matta on this topic. his
>>> protocol which i use now is to prep the SP catheter into the field, do your
>>> normal approach, repair bladder as indicated and place a new SP catheter or
>>> foley.
>>>
>>> no other special measures
>>>
>>> no infections in 19 patients
>>>
>>> dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David P. Zamorano, MD
>>> Assistant Chief, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
>>> Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
>>> Harbor/UCLA Medical Center
>>> Office (310) 222-2716
>>> Fax (310) 533-8791
>>>
>>> dpzamorano@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> From: Alexander Chelnokov <alex@orto.unets.ru>
>>>> Reply-To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
>>>> To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
>>>> Subject: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
>>>> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:17:29 +0600
>>>>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
>>>>>> reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
>>>>>> measures to prevent infection? THX!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Alexander N. Chelnokov
>>>>>> Ural Scientific Research Institute
>>>>>> of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
>>>>>> 7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i‚m Initiative now.
>>>> It‚s free. <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2737??PS=47575> --- [This E-mail
>>>> scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>>
>>
>> M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
>> Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
>> Harborview Medical Center
>> 325 Ninth Avenue
>> Box 359798
>> Seattle, WA 98104-2499
>> phone 206-731-3658
>> FAX 206-731-3227
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Daniel Schlatterer, DO
> Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
> Director, Orthopaedic Trauma
> Atlanta Medical Center
> 303 Parkway Dr. NE
> Atlanta, GA 30312
> 404-265-1578
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> ______
> Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail,
> news, photos & more.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC

M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
Harborview Medical Center
325 Ninth Avenue
Box 359798
Seattle, WA 98104-2499
phone 206-731-3658
FAX 206-731-3227
--



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



danschlatterer at yahoo
New User

Jun 11, 2007, 6:46 AM

Post #9 of 17 (2495 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

okay, I will get them together. thank you.
--- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:

> We'd need ct images to make reasonable recs.
>
> Chip
>
>
>
>
>
> > good morning to all,
> > attached are images of a 70 year old female after peds versus car. her own car
> > ran her over.
> > injuries are limited to the pelvis. left rami open and visible in a 10cm
> > vertical laceration just
> > lateral to left labia majora. wound is grossly clean. no vaginal and no
> > urinary issues. CT scan
> > shows widening of both SI joints anteriorly but I think this is vertically
> > stable pattern.
> >
> > pt treated that night with I/D and supra-acetabular frame to close the
> > ring. consideration was given for SI screws bilateraly, but given time of
> > night and other factors
> > decision made not to proceed.
> >
> > so the question is what next operatively if anything? concerns
> > are infection, nonunion anteriorly and possible incompetence of the pelvic
> > floor which may lead to
> > prolapse
> > issues. right rami are comminuted and plating may entail ilioinguinal approach
> > to extend plate
> > laterally to right iliac wing. retrograde screw up right rami is an option but
> > I am not convinced
> > it will add much. adding SI screws very doable, but major concern is restoring
> > anterior ring. so
> > far wound is clean and closed over a drain, and I have no plans to open it
> > back up and wash again.
> > maintaining pelvic alignment in ex-fix in 70 yo female for any length of time
> > may be challenging.
> > any thoughts? would anyone plate the pubic symphysis to close the gap and
> > leave the more lateral
> > rami fractures alone? the most recent pelvic case on this website involved pts
> > with suprapubic
> > catheters and antibiotic options including resorbable beads. I wonder how many
> > people would plate
> > and place antibiotic beads. thanks.
> >
> > dan schlatterer
> >
> > --- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry to be late...here’s an old reference.
> >>
> >> Chip
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Internal fixation in pelvic fractures and primary repairs of associated
> >> genitourinary disruptions: a team approach.
> >> Routt ML, Simonian PT, Defalco AJ, Miller J, Clarke T.
> >> Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle,
> >> Washington 98104, USA.
> >> Associated urological and orthopedic injuries of the pelvic ring are complex
> >> with numerous potential complications. These patients are treated optimally
> >> using a team approach. The combined expertise is not only helpful initially
> >> when managing these difficult patients, but also later as problems develop.
> >> This study describes a treatment protocol and reports the early results of
> >> 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures and associated bladder or
> >> urethral disruptions, or both, treated surgically with open reduction and
> >> internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring injuries at the same
> >> anesthetic and using the same surgical exposure as the urethral realignments
> >> or bladder repairs or both. Early complications occurred in four patients
> >> (17%): one patient sustained a fifth lumbar nerve injury caused by the
> >> pelvic reduction procedure, and three patients had anterior pelvic internal
> >> fixation failures. Late complications occurred in eight patients (35%).
> >> There was one deep wound infection (4.3%) that presented 6 weeks after
> >> injury. Late urological complications occurred in seven patients (30%). Four
> >> of the nine male patients with urethral disruptions had urethral stricture
> >> after their primary urethral realignments (44%). Three of the 18 male
> >> patients admitted to impotence (16.7%). One of the three had a residual
> >> thoracic paraplegia caused by a burst fracture. One of the five female
> >> patients had urinary incontinence and required a bladder suspension
> >> operation to restore normal function (20%). A low infection rate can be
> >> expected despite the use of internal fixation. Early urethral "indirect"
> >> realignments avoid more difficult delayed open repairs; however, late
> >> urological complication rates are still high. Early "direct" bladder repairs
> >> are easily performed at the time of anterior pelvic open reduction and
> >> internal fixation. Suprapubic tubes are not necessary to adequately divert
> >> the urine when large diameter urethral catheters are used in these patients.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> I'm currently working on a manuscript with Dr. Matta on this topic. his
> >>> protocol which i use now is to prep the SP catheter into the field, do your
> >>> normal approach, repair bladder as indicated and place a new SP catheter or
> >>> foley.
> >>>
> >>> no other special measures
> >>>
> >>> no infections in 19 patients
> >>>
> >>> dave
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> David P. Zamorano, MD
> >>> Assistant Chief, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
> >>> Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
> >>> Harbor/UCLA Medical Center
> >>> Office (310) 222-2716
> >>> Fax (310) 533-8791
> >>>
> >>> dpzamorano@hotmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Alexander Chelnokov <alex@orto.unets.ru>
> >>>> Reply-To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> >>>> To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> >>>> Subject: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
> >>>> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:17:29 +0600
> >>>>>> Dear colleagues,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
> >>>>>> reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
> >>>>>> measures to prevent infection? THX!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>> Alexander N. Chelnokov
> >>>>>> Ural Scientific Research Institute
> >>>>>> of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
> >>>>>> 7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i‚m Initiative now.
> >>>> It‚s free. <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2737??PS=47575> --- [This E-mail
> >>>> scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >>
> >>
> >> M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
> >> Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
> >> Harborview Medical Center
> >> 325 Ninth Avenue
> >> Box 359798
> >> Seattle, WA 98104-2499
> >> phone 206-731-3658
> >> FAX 206-731-3227
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Daniel Schlatterer, DO
> > Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
> > Director, Orthopaedic Trauma
> > Atlanta Medical Center
> > 303 Parkway Dr. NE
> > Atlanta, GA 30312
> > 404-265-1578
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________________
> > ______
> > Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail,
> > news, photos & more.
> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
>
> M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
> Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
> Harborview Medical Center
> 325 Ninth Avenue
> Box 359798
> Seattle, WA 98104-2499
> phone 206-731-3658
> FAX 206-731-3227
> --
>
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________________
Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's
Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/222
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



sagnewotpc at mac
New User

Jun 11, 2007, 7:05 AM

Post #10 of 17 (2495 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

Dan
More information is needed, please --before any realistic advice can be rendered:
What was/is her ambulatory and health status prior to her crushing injury
After your primary and secondary examination-what is the stability or instability pattern of her pelvic injury exactly?
No GU or GYN issues -based on what studies/examinations?
True inlet outlet and lateral (following AP crush) would be most helpful
CT scan images of necessary anatomic points both anterior and posterior

My concern is overall pelvic stability in addition to the wound factors.

As an aside I found it interesting that you can place a Supra-acetabular frame, pelvic washout in the 'dead of night' but could you elaborate more on your decision not to proceed with more definitive treatment as you eluded to?

Thanks
Samuel G. Agnew MD FACS
Orthopaedic Trauma


On Monday, June 11, 2007, at 07:39AM, "dan schlatterer" <danschlatterer@yahoo.com> wrote:
>good morning to all,
>attached are images of a 70 year old female after peds versus car. her own car ran her over.
>injuries are limited to the pelvis. left rami open and visible in a 10cm vertical laceration just
>lateral to left labia majora. wound is grossly clean. no vaginal and no urinary issues. CT scan
>shows widening of both SI joints anteriorly but I think this is vertically stable pattern.
>
>pt treated that night with I/D and supra-acetabular frame to close the
>ring. consideration was given for SI screws bilateraly, but given time of night and other factors
>decision made not to proceed.
>
>so the question is what next operatively if anything? concerns
>are infection, nonunion anteriorly and possible incompetence of the pelvic floor which may lead to
>prolapse
>issues. right rami are comminuted and plating may entail ilioinguinal approach to extend plate
>laterally to right iliac wing. retrograde screw up right rami is an option but I am not convinced
>it will add much. adding SI screws very doable, but major concern is restoring anterior ring. so
>far wound is clean and closed over a drain, and I have no plans to open it back up and wash again.
>maintaining pelvic alignment in ex-fix in 70 yo female for any length of time may be challenging.
>any thoughts? would anyone plate the pubic symphysis to close the gap and leave the more lateral
>rami fractures alone? the most recent pelvic case on this website involved pts with suprapubic
>catheters and antibiotic options including resorbable beads. I wonder how many people would plate
>and place antibiotic beads. thanks.
>
>dan schlatterer
>
>--- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>> Sorry to be late...here’s an old reference.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Internal fixation in pelvic fractures and primary repairs of associated
>> genitourinary disruptions: a team approach.
>> Routt ML, Simonian PT, Defalco AJ, Miller J, Clarke T.
>> Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle,
>> Washington 98104, USA.
>> Associated urological and orthopedic injuries of the pelvic ring are complex
>> with numerous potential complications. These patients are treated optimally
>> using a team approach. The combined expertise is not only helpful initially
>> when managing these difficult patients, but also later as problems develop.
>> This study describes a treatment protocol and reports the early results of
>> 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures and associated bladder or
>> urethral disruptions, or both, treated surgically with open reduction and
>> internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring injuries at the same
>> anesthetic and using the same surgical exposure as the urethral realignments
>> or bladder repairs or both. Early complications occurred in four patients
>> (17%): one patient sustained a fifth lumbar nerve injury caused by the
>> pelvic reduction procedure, and three patients had anterior pelvic internal
>> fixation failures. Late complications occurred in eight patients (35%).
>> There was one deep wound infection (4.3%) that presented 6 weeks after
>> injury. Late urological complications occurred in seven patients (30%). Four
>> of the nine male patients with urethral disruptions had urethral stricture
>> after their primary urethral realignments (44%). Three of the 18 male
>> patients admitted to impotence (16.7%). One of the three had a residual
>> thoracic paraplegia caused by a burst fracture. One of the five female
>> patients had urinary incontinence and required a bladder suspension
>> operation to restore normal function (20%). A low infection rate can be
>> expected despite the use of internal fixation. Early urethral "indirect"
>> realignments avoid more difficult delayed open repairs; however, late
>> urological complication rates are still high. Early "direct" bladder repairs
>> are easily performed at the time of anterior pelvic open reduction and
>> internal fixation. Suprapubic tubes are not necessary to adequately divert
>> the urine when large diameter urethral catheters are used in these patients.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > I'm currently working on a manuscript with Dr. Matta on this topic. his
>> > protocol which i use now is to prep the SP catheter into the field, do your
>> > normal approach, repair bladder as indicated and place a new SP catheter or
>> > foley.
>> >
>> > no other special measures
>> >
>> > no infections in 19 patients
>> >
>> > dave
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > David P. Zamorano, MD
>> > Assistant Chief, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
>> > Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
>> > Harbor/UCLA Medical Center
>> > Office (310) 222-2716
>> > Fax (310) 533-8791
>> >
>> > dpzamorano@hotmail.com
>> >>
>> >> From: Alexander Chelnokov <alex@orto.unets.ru>
>> >> Reply-To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
>> >> To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
>> >> Subject: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
>> >> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:17:29 +0600
>> >>> >Dear colleagues,
>> >>> >
>> >>> >If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
>> >>> >reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
>> >>> >measures to prevent infection? THX!
>> >>> >
>> >>> >--
>> >>> >Best regards,
>> >>> > Alexander N. Chelnokov
>> >>> >Ural Scientific Research Institute
>> >>> >of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
>> >>> >7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
>> >>> >
>> >>> >---
>> >>> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i‚m Initiative now.
>> >> It‚s free. <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2737??PS=47575> --- [This E-mail
>> >> scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>>
>>
>> M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
>> Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
>> Harborview Medical Center
>> 325 Ninth Avenue
>> Box 359798
>> Seattle, WA 98104-2499
>> phone 206-731-3658
>> FAX 206-731-3227
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>Daniel Schlatterer, DO
>Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
>Director, Orthopaedic Trauma
>Atlanta Medical Center
>303 Parkway Dr. NE
>Atlanta, GA 30312
>404-265-1578
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
>http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
>
>
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



danschlatterer at yahoo
New User

Jun 11, 2007, 8:45 AM

Post #11 of 17 (2495 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

attached are several CT cuts. please let me know if you need more. the CT is pre-pelvic ex-fix
placement. Thank you.
--- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:

> We'd need ct images to make reasonable recs.
>
> Chip
>
>
>
>
>
> > good morning to all,
> > attached are images of a 70 year old female after peds versus car. her own car
> > ran her over.
> > injuries are limited to the pelvis. left rami open and visible in a 10cm
> > vertical laceration just
> > lateral to left labia majora. wound is grossly clean. no vaginal and no
> > urinary issues. CT scan
> > shows widening of both SI joints anteriorly but I think this is vertically
> > stable pattern.
> >
> > pt treated that night with I/D and supra-acetabular frame to close the
> > ring. consideration was given for SI screws bilateraly, but given time of
> > night and other factors
> > decision made not to proceed.
> >
> > so the question is what next operatively if anything? concerns
> > are infection, nonunion anteriorly and possible incompetence of the pelvic
> > floor which may lead to
> > prolapse
> > issues. right rami are comminuted and plating may entail ilioinguinal approach
> > to extend plate
> > laterally to right iliac wing. retrograde screw up right rami is an option but
> > I am not convinced
> > it will add much. adding SI screws very doable, but major concern is restoring
> > anterior ring. so
> > far wound is clean and closed over a drain, and I have no plans to open it
> > back up and wash again.
> > maintaining pelvic alignment in ex-fix in 70 yo female for any length of time
> > may be challenging.
> > any thoughts? would anyone plate the pubic symphysis to close the gap and
> > leave the more lateral
> > rami fractures alone? the most recent pelvic case on this website involved pts
> > with suprapubic
> > catheters and antibiotic options including resorbable beads. I wonder how many
> > people would plate
> > and place antibiotic beads. thanks.
> >
> > dan schlatterer
> >
> > --- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry to be late...here’s an old reference.
> >>
> >> Chip
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Internal fixation in pelvic fractures and primary repairs of associated
> >> genitourinary disruptions: a team approach.
> >> Routt ML, Simonian PT, Defalco AJ, Miller J, Clarke T.
> >> Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle,
> >> Washington 98104, USA.
> >> Associated urological and orthopedic injuries of the pelvic ring are complex
> >> with numerous potential complications. These patients are treated optimally
> >> using a team approach. The combined expertise is not only helpful initially
> >> when managing these difficult patients, but also later as problems develop.
> >> This study describes a treatment protocol and reports the early results of
> >> 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures and associated bladder or
> >> urethral disruptions, or both, treated surgically with open reduction and
> >> internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring injuries at the same
> >> anesthetic and using the same surgical exposure as the urethral realignments
> >> or bladder repairs or both. Early complications occurred in four patients
> >> (17%): one patient sustained a fifth lumbar nerve injury caused by the
> >> pelvic reduction procedure, and three patients had anterior pelvic internal
> >> fixation failures. Late complications occurred in eight patients (35%).
> >> There was one deep wound infection (4.3%) that presented 6 weeks after
> >> injury. Late urological complications occurred in seven patients (30%). Four
> >> of the nine male patients with urethral disruptions had urethral stricture
> >> after their primary urethral realignments (44%). Three of the 18 male
> >> patients admitted to impotence (16.7%). One of the three had a residual
> >> thoracic paraplegia caused by a burst fracture. One of the five female
> >> patients had urinary incontinence and required a bladder suspension
> >> operation to restore normal function (20%). A low infection rate can be
> >> expected despite the use of internal fixation. Early urethral "indirect"
> >> realignments avoid more difficult delayed open repairs; however, late
> >> urological complication rates are still high. Early "direct" bladder repairs
> >> are easily performed at the time of anterior pelvic open reduction and
> >> internal fixation. Suprapubic tubes are not necessary to adequately divert
> >> the urine when large diameter urethral catheters are used in these patients.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> I'm currently working on a manuscript with Dr. Matta on this topic. his
> >>> protocol which i use now is to prep the SP catheter into the field, do your
> >>> normal approach, repair bladder as indicated and place a new SP catheter or
> >>> foley.
> >>>
> >>> no other special measures
> >>>
> >>> no infections in 19 patients
> >>>
> >>> dave
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> David P. Zamorano, MD
> >>> Assistant Chief, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
> >>> Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
> >>> Harbor/UCLA Medical Center
> >>> Office (310) 222-2716
> >>> Fax (310) 533-8791
> >>>
> >>> dpzamorano@hotmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Alexander Chelnokov <alex@orto.unets.ru>
> >>>> Reply-To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> >>>> To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> >>>> Subject: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
> >>>> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:17:29 +0600
> >>>>>> Dear colleagues,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
> >>>>>> reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
> >>>>>> measures to prevent infection? THX!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>> Alexander N. Chelnokov
> >>>>>> Ural Scientific Research Institute
> >>>>>> of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
> >>>>>> 7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i‚m Initiative now.
> >>>> It‚s free. <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2737??PS=47575> --- [This E-mail
> >>>> scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >>
> >>
> >> M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
> >> Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
> >> Harborview Medical Center
> >> 325 Ninth Avenue
> >> Box 359798
> >> Seattle, WA 98104-2499
> >> phone 206-731-3658
> >> FAX 206-731-3227
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Daniel Schlatterer, DO
> > Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
> > Director, Orthopaedic Trauma
> > Atlanta Medical Center
> > 303 Parkway Dr. NE
> > Atlanta, GA 30312
> > 404-265-1578
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________________
> > ______
> > Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail,
> > news, photos & more.
> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
>
> M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
> Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
> Harborview Medical Center
> 325 Ninth Avenue
> Box 359798
> Seattle, WA 98104-2499
> phone 206-731-3658
> FAX 206-731-3227
> --
>
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/
Attachments: spradlin 2007 open.ppt (506 KB)


danschlatterer at yahoo
New User

Jun 11, 2007, 9:30 AM

Post #12 of 17 (2495 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

hello sam
it is good to hear from you. this lady is an independent ambulator, lives alone, drives a pick-up
truck (which ran her over), and she is healthy. GYN pelvic exam was completed pre-operatively and
CT scan with contrast did not show any bladder/urethral leaks. no blood has ever been noted from
foley catheter or from the vagina. pretty amazing given the diastasis.

in terms of stressing the pelvis intra-operatively to assess overall stability, the trauma AP
pelvis and CT scan provided plenty of info. I suppose one could stress the vertical stability, but
again to what end? this pt had nearly 8cm of diastasis. rotational instability was a given. in
terms of a lateral pelvic xray, I cannot say that besides a false profile lateral for hip
dysplasia, I am not aware of lateral pelvic xrays for pelvic ring disruptions. if this is
something that you do I would be interested in seeing an xray or two.

your final question is a good one. why not place the SI screws at the time of the I/D and pelvic
ex-fix. the time involved is not that great. I place a lot of SI screws (at least I think I do
although I am sure others place more) and they can take very little time. no one factor made the
decision. it was a combo of poor fluoro (views and tech), time from injury, meaning these pts can
turn suddenly for the worse. so I started to feel that we were pushing too much (pts' pressure was
up/down, she was getting blood, etc), and so on. if I stayed in the OR longer and the pt crashed
(which I have seen) questions would arise. If I left the OR and the pt had no further problems and
retrospective it looked like I could have stayed in the OR longer then questions would arise. in
the middle of the night I am happy (relatively) to work but the goals of this case (emergent I/D
and pelvic stabilization) were met so I decided not to proceed any further. for a lot of folks
this will not be acceptable but to me less was more.

thank you for your input.

dan schlatterer
--- Sam Agnew <sagnewotpc@mac.com> wrote:

> Dan
> More information is needed, please --before any realistic advice can be rendered:
> What was/is her ambulatory and health status prior to her crushing injury
> After your primary and secondary examination-what is the stability or instability pattern of her
> pelvic injury exactly?
> No GU or GYN issues -based on what studies/examinations?
> True inlet outlet and lateral (following AP crush) would be most helpful
> CT scan images of necessary anatomic points both anterior and posterior
>
> My concern is overall pelvic stability in addition to the wound factors.
>
> As an aside I found it interesting that you can place a Supra-acetabular frame, pelvic washout
> in the 'dead of night' but could you elaborate more on your decision not to proceed with more
> definitive treatment as you eluded to?
>
> Thanks
> Samuel G. Agnew MD FACS
> Orthopaedic Trauma
>
>
> On Monday, June 11, 2007, at 07:39AM, "dan schlatterer" <danschlatterer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >good morning to all,
> >attached are images of a 70 year old female after peds versus car. her own car ran her over.
> >injuries are limited to the pelvis. left rami open and visible in a 10cm vertical laceration
> just
> >lateral to left labia majora. wound is grossly clean. no vaginal and no urinary issues. CT scan
> >shows widening of both SI joints anteriorly but I think this is vertically stable pattern.
> >
> >pt treated that night with I/D and supra-acetabular frame to close the
> >ring. consideration was given for SI screws bilateraly, but given time of night and other
> factors
> >decision made not to proceed.
> >
> >so the question is what next operatively if anything? concerns
> >are infection, nonunion anteriorly and possible incompetence of the pelvic floor which may lead
> to
> >prolapse
> >issues. right rami are comminuted and plating may entail ilioinguinal approach to extend plate
> >laterally to right iliac wing. retrograde screw up right rami is an option but I am not
> convinced
> >it will add much. adding SI screws very doable, but major concern is restoring anterior ring.
> so
> >far wound is clean and closed over a drain, and I have no plans to open it back up and wash
> again.
> >maintaining pelvic alignment in ex-fix in 70 yo female for any length of time may be
> challenging.
> >any thoughts? would anyone plate the pubic symphysis to close the gap and leave the more
> lateral
> >rami fractures alone? the most recent pelvic case on this website involved pts with suprapubic
> >catheters and antibiotic options including resorbable beads. I wonder how many people would
> plate
> >and place antibiotic beads. thanks.
> >
> >dan schlatterer
> >
> >--- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry to be late...here’s an old reference.
> >>
> >> Chip
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Internal fixation in pelvic fractures and primary repairs of associated
> >> genitourinary disruptions: a team approach.
> >> Routt ML, Simonian PT, Defalco AJ, Miller J, Clarke T.
> >> Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle,
> >> Washington 98104, USA.
> >> Associated urological and orthopedic injuries of the pelvic ring are complex
> >> with numerous potential complications. These patients are treated optimally
> >> using a team approach. The combined expertise is not only helpful initially
> >> when managing these difficult patients, but also later as problems develop.
> >> This study describes a treatment protocol and reports the early results of
> >> 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures and associated bladder or
> >> urethral disruptions, or both, treated surgically with open reduction and
> >> internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring injuries at the same
> >> anesthetic and using the same surgical exposure as the urethral realignments
> >> or bladder repairs or both. Early complications occurred in four patients
> >> (17%): one patient sustained a fifth lumbar nerve injury caused by the
> >> pelvic reduction procedure, and three patients had anterior pelvic internal
> >> fixation failures. Late complications occurred in eight patients (35%).
> >> There was one deep wound infection (4.3%) that presented 6 weeks after
> >> injury. Late urological complications occurred in seven patients (30%). Four
> >> of the nine male patients with urethral disruptions had urethral stricture
> >> after their primary urethral realignments (44%). Three of the 18 male
> >> patients admitted to impotence (16.7%). One of the three had a residual
> >> thoracic paraplegia caused by a burst fracture. One of the five female
> >> patients had urinary incontinence and required a bladder suspension
> >> operation to restore normal function (20%). A low infection rate can be
> >> expected despite the use of internal fixation. Early urethral "indirect"
> >> realignments avoid more difficult delayed open repairs; however, late
> >> urological complication rates are still high. Early "direct" bladder repairs
> >> are easily performed at the time of anterior pelvic open reduction and
> >> internal fixation. Suprapubic tubes are not necessary to adequately divert
> >> the urine when large diameter urethral catheters are used in these patients.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > I'm currently working on a manuscript with Dr. Matta on this topic. his
> >> > protocol which i use now is to prep the SP catheter into the field, do your
> >> > normal approach, repair bladder as indicated and place a new SP catheter or
> >> > foley.
> >> >
> >> > no other special measures
> >> >
> >> > no infections in 19 patients
> >> >
> >> > dave
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > David P. Zamorano, MD
> >> > Assistant Chief, Orthopaedic Trauma Service
> >> > Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
> >> > Harbor/UCLA Medical Center
> >> > Office (310) 222-2716
> >> > Fax (310) 533-8791
> >> >
> >> > dpzamorano@hotmail.com
> >> >>
> >> >> From: Alexander Chelnokov <alex@orto.unets.ru>
> >> >> Reply-To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> >> >> To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org
> >> >> Subject: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
> >> >> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:17:29 +0600
> >> >>> >Dear colleagues,
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open
> >> >>> >reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special
> >> >>> >measures to prevent infection? THX!
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >--
> >> >>> >Best regards,
> >> >>> > Alexander N. Chelnokov
> >> >>> >Ural Scientific Research Institute
> >> >>> >of Traumatology and Orthopaedics
> >> >>> >7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >---
> >> >>> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >> >>> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i‚m Initiative now.
> >> >> It‚s free. <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2737??PS=47575> --- [This E-mail
> >> >> scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >>
> >>
> >> M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D.
> >> Professor-Orthopedic Surgery
> >> Harborview Medical Center
> >> 325 Ninth Avenue
> >> Box 359798
> >> Seattle, WA 98104-2499
> >> phone 206-731-3658
> >> FAX 206-731-3227
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >Daniel Schlatterer, DO
> >Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
> >Director, Orthopaedic Trauma
> >Atlanta Medical Center
> >303 Parkway Dr. NE
> >Atlanta, GA 30312
> >404-265-1578
> >
> >
> >
> >____________________________________________________________________________________
> >Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
> >http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
> >
> >
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



mlroutt at u
New User

Jun 11, 2007, 10:47 AM

Post #13 of 17 (2495 views)
Shortcut
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? [In reply to] Can't Post

I wouldn't plate the front.

But I would add screws posteriorly.

Chip






> attached are several CT cuts. please let me know if you need more. the CT is
> pre-pelvic ex-fix
> placement. Thank you.
> --- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>> We'd need ct images to make reasonable recs.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> good morning to all,
>>> attached are images of a 70 year old female after peds versus car. her own
>>> car
>>> ran her over.
>>> injuries are limited to the pelvis. left rami open and visible in a 10cm
>>> vertical laceration just
>>> lateral to left labia majora. wound is grossly clean. no vaginal and no
>>> urinary issues. CT scan
>>> shows widening of both SI joints anteriorly but I think this is vertically
>>> stable pattern.
>>>
>>> pt treated that night with I/D and supra-acetabular frame to close the
>>> ring. consideration was given for SI screws bilateraly, but given time of
>>> night and other factors
>>> decision made not to proceed.
>>>
>>> so the question is what next operatively if anything? concerns
>>> are infection, nonunion anteriorly and possible incompetence of the pelvic
>>> floor which may lead to
>>> prolapse
>>> issues. right rami are comminuted and plating may entail ilioinguinal
>>> approach
>>> to extend plate
>>> laterally to right iliac wing. retrograde screw up right rami is an option
>>> but
>>> I am not convinced
>>> it will add much. adding SI screws very doable, but major concern is
>>> restoring
>>> anterior ring. so
>>> far wound is clean and closed over a drain, and I have no plans to open it
>>> back up and wash again.
>>> maintaining pelvic alignment in ex-fix in 70 yo female for any length of
>>> time
>>> may be challenging.
>>> any thoughts? would anyone plate the pubic symphysis to close the gap and
>>> leave the more lateral
>>> rami fractures alone? the most recent pelvic case on this website involved
>>> pts
>>> with suprapubic
>>> catheters and antibiotic options including resorbable beads. I wonder how
>>> many
>>> people would plate
>>> and place antibiotic beads. thanks.
>>>
>>> dan schlatterer
>>>
>>> --- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry to be late...here’s an old reference.
>>>>
>>>> Chip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Internal fixation in pelvic fractures and primary repairs of associated
>>>> genitourinary disruptions: a team approach.
>>>> Routt ML, Simonian PT, Defalco AJ, Miller J, Clarke T.
>>>> Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle,
>>>> Washington 98104, USA.
>>>> Associated urological and orthopedic injuries of the pelvic ring are
>>>> complex
>>>> with numerous potential complications. These patients are treated optimally
>>>> using a team approach. The combined expertise is not only helpful initially
>>>> when managing these difficult patients, but also later as problems develop.
>>>> This study describes a treatment protocol and reports the early results of
>>>> 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures and associated bladder or
>>>> urethral disruptions, or both, treated surgically with open reduction and
>>>> internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring injuries at the same
>>>> anesthetic and using the same surgical exposure as the urethral
>>>> realignments
>>>> or bladder repairs or both. Early complications occurred in four patients
>>>> (17%): one patient sustained a fifth lumbar nerve injury caused by the
>>>> pelvic reduction procedure, and three patients had anterior pelvic internal
>>>> fixation failures. Late complications occurred in eight patients (35%).
>>>> There was one deep wound infection (4.3%) that presented 6 weeks after
>>>> injury. Late urological complications occurred in seven patients (30%).
>>>> Four
>>>> of the nine male patients with urethral disruptions had urethral stricture
>>>> after their primary urethral realignments (44%). Three of the 18 male
>>>> patients admitted to impotence (16.7%). One of the three had a residual
>>>> thoracic paraplegia caused by a burst fracture. One of the five female
>>>> patients had urinary incontinence and required a bladder suspension
>>>> operation to restore normal function (20%). A low infection rate can be
>>>> expected despite the use of internal fixation. Early urethral "indirect"
>>>> realignments avoid more difficult delayed open repairs; however, late
>>>> urological complication rates are still high. Early "direct" bladder
>>>> repairs
>>>> are easily performed at the time of anterior pelvic open reduction and
>>>> internal fixation. Suprapubic tubes are not necessary to adequately divert
>>>> the urine when large diameter urethral catheters are used in these
>>>> patients.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently working on a manuscript with Dr. Matta on this topic. his
>>>>> protocol which i use now is to prep the SP catheter into the field, do
>>>>> your
>>>>> normal approach, repair bladder as indicated and place a new SP catheter
>>>>> or
&