
danschlatterer at yahoo
New User
Jun 11, 2007, 9:30 AM
Post #12 of 17
(2495 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube?
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
hello sam it is good to hear from you. this lady is an independent ambulator, lives alone, drives a pick-up truck (which ran her over), and she is healthy. GYN pelvic exam was completed pre-operatively and CT scan with contrast did not show any bladder/urethral leaks. no blood has ever been noted from foley catheter or from the vagina. pretty amazing given the diastasis. in terms of stressing the pelvis intra-operatively to assess overall stability, the trauma AP pelvis and CT scan provided plenty of info. I suppose one could stress the vertical stability, but again to what end? this pt had nearly 8cm of diastasis. rotational instability was a given. in terms of a lateral pelvic xray, I cannot say that besides a false profile lateral for hip dysplasia, I am not aware of lateral pelvic xrays for pelvic ring disruptions. if this is something that you do I would be interested in seeing an xray or two. your final question is a good one. why not place the SI screws at the time of the I/D and pelvic ex-fix. the time involved is not that great. I place a lot of SI screws (at least I think I do although I am sure others place more) and they can take very little time. no one factor made the decision. it was a combo of poor fluoro (views and tech), time from injury, meaning these pts can turn suddenly for the worse. so I started to feel that we were pushing too much (pts' pressure was up/down, she was getting blood, etc), and so on. if I stayed in the OR longer and the pt crashed (which I have seen) questions would arise. If I left the OR and the pt had no further problems and retrospective it looked like I could have stayed in the OR longer then questions would arise. in the middle of the night I am happy (relatively) to work but the goals of this case (emergent I/D and pelvic stabilization) were met so I decided not to proceed any further. for a lot of folks this will not be acceptable but to me less was more. thank you for your input. dan schlatterer --- Sam Agnew <sagnewotpc@mac.com> wrote: > Dan > More information is needed, please --before any realistic advice can be rendered: > What was/is her ambulatory and health status prior to her crushing injury > After your primary and secondary examination-what is the stability or instability pattern of her > pelvic injury exactly? > No GU or GYN issues -based on what studies/examinations? > True inlet outlet and lateral (following AP crush) would be most helpful > CT scan images of necessary anatomic points both anterior and posterior > > My concern is overall pelvic stability in addition to the wound factors. > > As an aside I found it interesting that you can place a Supra-acetabular frame, pelvic washout > in the 'dead of night' but could you elaborate more on your decision not to proceed with more > definitive treatment as you eluded to? > > Thanks > Samuel G. Agnew MD FACS > Orthopaedic Trauma > > > On Monday, June 11, 2007, at 07:39AM, "dan schlatterer" <danschlatterer@yahoo.com> wrote: > >good morning to all, > >attached are images of a 70 year old female after peds versus car. her own car ran her over. > >injuries are limited to the pelvis. left rami open and visible in a 10cm vertical laceration > just > >lateral to left labia majora. wound is grossly clean. no vaginal and no urinary issues. CT scan > >shows widening of both SI joints anteriorly but I think this is vertically stable pattern. > > > >pt treated that night with I/D and supra-acetabular frame to close the > >ring. consideration was given for SI screws bilateraly, but given time of night and other > factors > >decision made not to proceed. > > > >so the question is what next operatively if anything? concerns > >are infection, nonunion anteriorly and possible incompetence of the pelvic floor which may lead > to > >prolapse > >issues. right rami are comminuted and plating may entail ilioinguinal approach to extend plate > >laterally to right iliac wing. retrograde screw up right rami is an option but I am not > convinced > >it will add much. adding SI screws very doable, but major concern is restoring anterior ring. > so > >far wound is clean and closed over a drain, and I have no plans to open it back up and wash > again. > >maintaining pelvic alignment in ex-fix in 70 yo female for any length of time may be > challenging. > >any thoughts? would anyone plate the pubic symphysis to close the gap and leave the more > lateral > >rami fractures alone? the most recent pelvic case on this website involved pts with suprapubic > >catheters and antibiotic options including resorbable beads. I wonder how many people would > plate > >and place antibiotic beads. thanks. > > > >dan schlatterer > > > >--- Chip Routt <mlroutt@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > >> Sorry to be late...here’s an old reference. > >> > >> Chip > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Internal fixation in pelvic fractures and primary repairs of associated > >> genitourinary disruptions: a team approach. > >> Routt ML, Simonian PT, Defalco AJ, Miller J, Clarke T. > >> Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle, > >> Washington 98104, USA. > >> Associated urological and orthopedic injuries of the pelvic ring are complex > >> with numerous potential complications. These patients are treated optimally > >> using a team approach. The combined expertise is not only helpful initially > >> when managing these difficult patients, but also later as problems develop. > >> This study describes a treatment protocol and reports the early results of > >> 23 patients with unstable pelvic fractures and associated bladder or > >> urethral disruptions, or both, treated surgically with open reduction and > >> internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring injuries at the same > >> anesthetic and using the same surgical exposure as the urethral realignments > >> or bladder repairs or both. Early complications occurred in four patients > >> (17%): one patient sustained a fifth lumbar nerve injury caused by the > >> pelvic reduction procedure, and three patients had anterior pelvic internal > >> fixation failures. Late complications occurred in eight patients (35%). > >> There was one deep wound infection (4.3%) that presented 6 weeks after > >> injury. Late urological complications occurred in seven patients (30%). Four > >> of the nine male patients with urethral disruptions had urethral stricture > >> after their primary urethral realignments (44%). Three of the 18 male > >> patients admitted to impotence (16.7%). One of the three had a residual > >> thoracic paraplegia caused by a burst fracture. One of the five female > >> patients had urinary incontinence and required a bladder suspension > >> operation to restore normal function (20%). A low infection rate can be > >> expected despite the use of internal fixation. Early urethral "indirect" > >> realignments avoid more difficult delayed open repairs; however, late > >> urological complication rates are still high. Early "direct" bladder repairs > >> are easily performed at the time of anterior pelvic open reduction and > >> internal fixation. Suprapubic tubes are not necessary to adequately divert > >> the urine when large diameter urethral catheters are used in these patients. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I'm currently working on a manuscript with Dr. Matta on this topic. his > >> > protocol which i use now is to prep the SP catheter into the field, do your > >> > normal approach, repair bladder as indicated and place a new SP catheter or > >> > foley. > >> > > >> > no other special measures > >> > > >> > no infections in 19 patients > >> > > >> > dave > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > David P. Zamorano, MD > >> > Assistant Chief, Orthopaedic Trauma Service > >> > Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery > >> > Harbor/UCLA Medical Center > >> > Office (310) 222-2716 > >> > Fax (310) 533-8791 > >> > > >> > dpzamorano@hotmail.com > >> >> > >> >> From: Alexander Chelnokov <alex@orto.unets.ru> > >> >> Reply-To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org > >> >> To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org > >> >> Subject: [ORT-L] ORIF and suprapubic tube? > >> >> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:17:29 +0600 > >> >>> >Dear colleagues, > >> >>> > > >> >>> >If a patient has a suprapubic tube, is it possible to perform open > >> >>> >reduction and plating of the anterior part of the ring? Any special > >> >>> >measures to prevent infection? THX! > >> >>> > > >> >>> >-- > >> >>> >Best regards, > >> >>> > Alexander N. Chelnokov > >> >>> >Ural Scientific Research Institute > >> >>> >of Traumatology and Orthopaedics > >> >>> >7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia > >> >>> > > >> >>> >--- > >> >>> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > >> >>> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Make every IM count. Download Messenger and join the i‚m Initiative now. > >> >> It‚s free. <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2737??PS=47575> --- [This E-mail > >> >> scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > >> > >> > >> M.L. Chip Routt, Jr.,M.D. > >> Professor-Orthopedic Surgery > >> Harborview Medical Center > >> 325 Ninth Avenue > >> Box 359798 > >> Seattle, WA 98104-2499 > >> phone 206-731-3658 > >> FAX 206-731-3227 > >> -- > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >Daniel Schlatterer, DO > >Interim Program Director, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery > >Director, Orthopaedic Trauma > >Atlanta Medical Center > >303 Parkway Dr. NE > >Atlanta, GA 30312 > >404-265-1578 > > > > > > > >____________________________________________________________________________________ > >Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. > >http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC > > > > > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/ --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
|