
george.s.thomas at gmail
New User
Nov 26, 2007, 5:58 PM
Post #6 of 10
(944 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [ORT-L] Distal femur non union
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
It should have healed with the locking plate, provided the plate was introduced using a minimal invasive technique. However, once that plate had failed, the subsequent attempts at plate osteosynthesis ignored the medial buttress required, and by the time the nails were used there is already a gap. At this point my choice would be a thin wire fixator (Ilizarov), proximal corticotomy and compression at the fracture site. On Nov 27, 2007 5:03 AM, Jeff Brooks <jjbrooksmd@gmail.com> wrote: > Mark Brinker's group published a very thought-provoking article in a > recent (<6 mos) J.O.T. that showed significant metabolic abnormalities in > patients with nonunions that "should have" otherwise healed, as this "should > have". (they had specific criteria for inclusion in the 'should have' > group). I forget the exact distribution of abnormalities but they included > most frequently Vitamin D deficiency, abnormalities of calcium and > parathyroid function, and some other metabolic problems. > Bottom line in my opinion: be sure this young healthy kid is thoroughly > worked up metabolically before any more surgery. > > Jeff > > PS - I can send the .pdf of that article if you want to see it. > > > On Nov 26, 2007, at 4:15 PM, shital parikh wrote: > > An Ilizarov apparatus is useful for such nonunions. it is more elastic > than the other implants giving it a compressive effect with full weight > bearing. A corticotomy above and a few cm of bone transport will help 2 fold > - compression across fracture site and resotration of blood supply by > neovascularization. the construct can be 3 rings. two above the fracture and > one below, and the corticotomy between 1st and 2nd rings. > best wishes > > > Shital Parikh, MD > 2769352165 > > > > Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:53:01 +0500 > > From: alex@weborto.net > > To: ORT-L@www2.aaos.org > > Subject: Re: [ORT-L] Distal femur non union > > > > Dear Carel, > > > > > > [...] > > > > > All with gradual/partial weightbearing etc. Currently 50-100% weight > > > bearing, no pain. > > > Soft tissues are intact. No smoking or diabetes. > > > CRP <2 > > > > > > What would you do? > > > > > > Tough case. Severe injury, many surgeries... > > I'd prefer to be less agressive to periosteal blood supply slowly > > reviving after all those plates. > > Looks like shortening is not significant yet. So my choice would be > > closed re-nailing with a larger nail. Some time ago an option of dynamic > > > locking in comression by special end cap was discussed in the list - > > IMHO it is suitable for this case. The nail will play role of shaft > > endoprosthesis for some years that must be enough for restoration of > > cortical blood supply. Good luck! > > > > ___ > > Best regards, > > Alexander N. Chelnokov > > Ural Scientific Research Institute > > of Traumatology and Orthopaedics > > 7, Bankovsky str. Ekaterinburg 620014 Russia > > --- > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > > > > ------------------------------ > Live the life in style with MSN Lifestyle. Check out! Try it now!<http://content.msn.co.in/Lifestyle/Default> > > > -- George Thomas, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Chennai, India Editor, Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, www.issuesinmedicalethics.org www.ijme.in
|